News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Supreme Court rules against Epic, so Apple can keep its A... by dabluecaboose on Wednesday August 09, 2023 @01:38PM (#37066089)
> If I understand correctly, this is not a final decision.

It is not a final decision. The title is flat-out incorrect, the SC didn't "rule" anything. They didn't even hear the case.

Re:Supreme Court rules against Epic, so Apple can keep its A... by vicktour on Wednesday August 09, 2023 @01:55PM (#37066294)
Not hearing a case is nearly as impactful as hearing one. Its just easier to overturn it in the future if they want to.
Re:Supreme Court rules against Epic, so Apple can keep its A... by wtallis on Wednesday August 09, 2023 @01:57PM (#37066316)
I don't think the Supreme Court has refused to hear the case, they've just refused to vacate the stay that is preventing the lower court's ruling from taking effect yet.
Re:Supreme Court rules against Epic, so Apple can keep its A... by kennywinker on Wednesday August 09, 2023 @01:58PM (#37066326)
Overturning long standing law doesn’t seem to be a problem for the current supreme court