Re:TSMC, Bosch, Infineon, and NXP to build fab in Germany
by sho_hn on Tuesday August 08, 2023 @09:47AM
(#37048915)
Aren't LLMs potentially great to ward off language death due to their significant abilities to transpose ideas into different languages?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:TSMC, Bosch, Infineon, and NXP to build fab in Germany
by dontupvoteme on Tuesday August 08, 2023 @09:52AM
(#37048968)
I admit that I talk to it in English the most (as it's my native tongue) but I had read here that it has gotten noticeably worse in other languages, even making grammar mistakes in linguistically-close-to-english-and-sufficently-present-in-training-data western european languages like German or French.
I do enjoy translating things into Sindarian or other conglangs from literature though.
I had a theory that giving it the custom instructions in latin might give better results, but i haven't had time to figure out how to benchmark something that's so non-deterministic and black-boxy
Re:TSMC, Bosch, Infineon, and NXP to build fab in Germany
by oblio on Tuesday August 08, 2023 @10:02AM
(#37049114)
> Aren't LLMs potentially great to ward off language death due to their significant abilities to transpose ideas into different languages?
What do you mean?
Re:TSMC, Bosch, Infineon, and NXP to build fab in Germany
by berkes on Tuesday August 08, 2023 @10:19AM
(#37049330)
Not GP, but in my case, I find my conversations with ChatGPT or Copilot often being in my native language. Whereas with Google, official docs, and StackExchage it's only and always English.
Obviously, the code I write in the end is English. But explaining a domain in a native language - especially when that domain embeds cultural things - helps a lot. For example, there's a massive difference between "add_high_VAT()" in a Dutch Context from a US context. Even add_VAT(lookup_VAT("FR", "low")) demands quite some domain-knowledge about EU tax system. Which I can express in English, but is much easier in my native language.