If you’re in this market long enough, you know that apart from the current hype, RISC-V is not special.
Except that there are many suppliers who have verified chips that they are happy to sell you. And for some categories of chips, even open ones that are verified.
> It’s not on creating an ISA, as there are already many that are free.
There are not actually many that are free. And non that a are free and practical with lots of suppliers.
> If you’re in this market long enough, you know that apart from the current hype, RISC-V is not special.
Ah that is why RISC-V has a insane growth rate and it getting increasing adoption in lots of different market. Maybe somebody should have told all those people that its not actually special.
It seems extremely likely that the goal is to create a RISC-V ecosystem, which ranges from design, to chips, to endproducts in automotive.
To rival ARM you need an actual competitive industrial product.
- You need to define use-cases "what chips does a car need?", specific technical requirements "what communication, what instruction sets, what speed, etc.?"
- Figure out how produce chips at scale
- Create suitable development environments, libraries and integration into other buisiness tools
-Use that tooling to create an embedded product
ARM has all of that in their ecosystem, RISC-V does not. None of the companies listed can do all of that on their own. If they want to compete with ARM they need to compete with the entire ARM ecosystem and it seems that is their goal.
The current info:
> aimed at advancing the adoption of RISC-V globally by enabling next-generation hardware development.
Doesn't tell you much!