RetroTechie
What's missing here is the "made in Europe" bit. Currently (very few exceptions), RISC-V SoCs are designed by Chinese companies, maybe fabricated in Taiwan, and boards they go on manufactured in China.
Imho that is what Europe needs to address. With EU-made boards available, the software side is the easy part.
There is some European CPU initiative. Sounds great but where are the boards?
A lot of support for old CPUs & platforms they're on goes through emulators like QEMU. Or plain old 'go with specs, disturb code as little as possible, and assume (hope) it still works'. But nothing beats running on actual hardware. Uncommon configurations, specific drivers that may have been broken (sometimes for a looong time before someone notices), spec says A but hardware does B, etc.
That's discounting architectural innovations & improvements which are bound to happen somehow.
Eg. recent Albert Heijn (Dutch supermarket chain) "cyber incident" must have cost them 10s of millions of Euros.
That's real gain for any competitor NOT having such issue. See eg. Darwinian evolution on how even small (dis)advantages can lead to species being outcompeted & disappearing.
As others have proclaimed: what matters is taste. And (perhaps?) a deep understanding of the subject matter. Which may or may not be encoded in formal specifications. But may also include 'fuzzy' domain-specific knowledge that can't be scraped from the web.
> Humans don't code anymore
I do, and I'm far from alone. Whether 'product' gains traction, that's another matter. But you know what? It doesn't matter. If it works for [author], that's enough.
CEO... sure that beach vacation will still be nice after they've collected their golden parachute while company goes up in flames. But anyone else?
# Author
# Date published (like enter a from-date and/or to-date)
# License
# Free download available y/n
# Sample chapter available
# Format: softcover / hardcover / ebook / audiobook etc
# No. of pages
# Language(s)
# Can you watch the movie? (if so: IMDB/Wiki link)
Failing other mitigations, operations this sensitive could be limited to systems with on-chip RAM. That said: seems more like a theoretical than practical method. Still pretty cool though.
Find a way to lower salt & arsenic content, and it could be an excellent fertilizer.
"sysctl -a | grep net.mptcp.enabled" gives "net.mptcp.enabled = 1" on Debian 13 (Trixie). That's a non-server desktop install fwiw.
Edit - security advisory is here: (dated Oct 16) https://lists.debian.org/debian-security-announce/2026/msg00...
And personally I expect that datacenter buildout to slow down. The AI bubble won't last, and average dude in the street simply won't up their spending on AI (applications) to a level that justifies the ongoing buildout.
Yes lots of resources will be wasted. But it won't last, markets & investors will correct the situation somehow.
Can't say I'm feeling much empathy for the passengers here. That said: this companies' planning was piss-poor going by the article. Fuel prices go up & down, can't you hedge / insure against that somehow? Buy fuel in advance, take delivery in batches at locations A, B, C around the world. Something like that? Passengers paid $320k/pop, and best you could do is pass the hat & drop 'em off in the next port? Shame on you.
Edit: don't be surprised if that ship still sits in same Cambodian harbour years from now. With a fat (unpaid) bill attached, amid ongoing legal battles. What a waste...
Nonsense. All that's needed is asking around, and listen. You could literally throw the dice, go to random country X, and ask the 1st person you meet what would make their life better.
Maybe the gutter on their roof is leaking, and they need someone to fix it. If so, maybe there's more people with the same problem, and a gutter-fixer would make people happy.
Sure, if you have a 'grand vision' and (again, by asking around) find there's others sharing that vision, by all means go work on that. But to find something useful to work on, any 'vision' is really not required.
Does it also show that when invoked with a filename? If not: it should! (newbie user invoking with a filename *also* doesn't know how to use the editor. So that help pointer should be shown in both cases).
That'll be server-CPU territory, most likely? (read: not supported by cheapo 4/8-core consumer CPUs)
Yes, what smart RAM manufacturers (or who've been longer in the business) are doing: ramp up production capacity, but do so gradually.
Those ramp-up timelines tend to be longer than the markets' boom & bust cycles. So they'll be looking at longER-term trends to decide what to invest in & when.
1) Assuming that RAM in AI datacenter is doing more useful work than outside it.
Wrong! That depends entirely on what it's used for. And since mr. Altman doesn't KNOW what your or my RAM chip(s) are used for, he also can't decide which use is more important.
2) What he deems more important, is a matter of opinion. What's important to him, likely won't matter to me. And vice versa.
Go read some history books, mr. Altman! Maaany wars have been fought over "I know what's best for everyone! Now bow & kiss my toes!"
Oh and 3) all those AI datacenters are built using other people's money than the tech bros running the show. Whereas consumers pay for RAM with their own money. But hey, no doubt it's more fun to shovel *other* people's cash into a firepit.
Humanity is destroying this planet's biosphere in the pursuit of greed. And it might well cause our demise (not just us, btw) if we don't change our ways.
Imho it's hard to find flaws in the logic laid out in the essay. If you can: bring it on!
Try & look for this in any activity. It's analog to "attention makes [X] more beautiful". Put more effort in = get more out of it.
It's so easy to get lost in things that appear fun/useful at first, but turn into a pointless timesink that gets you nothing.
Do things that move you forward, solve problems, learn, help others, sharpen your skills. For such activities, any effort invested has a return.
This is the future, imho: some tiny, cross-platform, ultra-reliable kernel (like seL4), a set of shims that offer different sets of APIs (OS "personalities" if you will) to apps, an emulator, VM or binary translation layer here & there, all happily living under the same roof.
*BSD (including Linux compat layer) + Wine + some emulators like DOSBox already goes a long way. MS Windows desktop running on top of Linux isn't outside the realm of the possible either. And be sure to check Genode OS.
Fun times ahead!
THIS, so much. One time (~1995 or so?) I bought a boxed SUSE Linux release. Pulled out the book, and practically on the 1st page, there was a copyright notice specifically allowing anyone to copy that book & pass it on. Whereas for practically every other book I'd had in my hands up to that point, copyright notices consisted of various "forbidden to do X, Y or Z" statements.
That right there convinced me I had something different, something special in my hands. Disclaimer: I had read about "open source" before, so I did know what I was looking at. But still it felt special.
Unsurprisingly: note the documentation linked to at the end of jmmv's Unix<->NT comparison above. They're ALL Amazon "buy this book" links. Over on the Linux/BSD side of the fence, such references are typically web pages, man pages, a free-download pdf or the like.
It's not the "free beer" aspect that got me over time. It's the "open", "sharing", "community project", versus "closed", "profit", "property of BigCorp Inc".
Same with food. NONE of this type of preparation is difficult, very space / time consuming, or expensive.
As for the LNG situation: worst case is do without heating. Totally doable in UK climate; extra layers of clothing & blankets / sleeping bags do the job (been there, done that in the NL).
Remember we're talking getting through a crisis, not comfort. Although you can have both with more prep work.
NetBSD userland is not?
For who 'needs' it, USB-Ethernet dongles exist.
Yes, and that makes not dealing with this issue worse on Apple's part. If MacOS' setup somehow doesn't allow untangling a (still deemed trustworthy?!?) root certificate issued by eMudhra from the broken intermediate certificates, then revoke that whole chain including the root & accept collateral damage.
Failing that just provides an incentive for apps to do their own chain-of-trust implementations. Which like you said is not the way to go.