News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A fridge from 70 years ago has better features than the f... by Levitz on Monday July 31, 2023 @09:54AM (#36942498)
It's also a consequence of constant R&D improvements.

We can make appliances that last for 20 years or more, sure, but then when 20 years pass you have an appliance that is 20 years old and doesn't have any of that new stuff that came out in the last 20 years.

Re:A fridge from 70 years ago has better features than the f... by ilyt on Monday July 31, 2023 @10:00AM (#36942580)
There is a level where you don't care about more improvements. Fridge is a box of cold stuff. I don't need much more than that.

Sure it could be slightly more efficient but even 20 years old ones are pretty efficient, and I'd rather just slap an extra solar panel or two on the roof rather than replace whole fridge and junk the old one.

Re:A fridge from 70 years ago has better features than the f... by random_savv on Monday July 31, 2023 @10:07AM (#36942677)
When I did the math on replacing a 10-15 year old fridge, I was able to amortize the cost of the new fridge in 2.5 years, from the energy savings.
Re:A fridge from 70 years ago has better features than the f... by momirlan on Monday July 31, 2023 @10:14AM (#36942804)
assuming the new one will last 2.5 years...
Re:A fridge from 70 years ago has better features than the f... by williamcotton on Monday July 31, 2023 @10:18AM (#36942870)
https://www.thisoldhouse.com/home-finances/reviews/best-refr...

It looks like all of the major manufacturers have a "sealed system" warranty for five years:

A refrigerator’s sealed system typically refers to the compressor, evaporator, condenser, dryer, and connection tubing. Most companies cover both parts and labor for this system for five years. Miele and KitchenAid extend this sealed system warranty for an extra five years. Note that years six through 10 cover parts only.

Re:A fridge from 70 years ago has better features than the f... by maccard on Monday July 31, 2023 @10:21AM (#36942919)
Barring something going horribly wrong, even the cheapest of cheap household appliances will last that, and more. Most major retailers offer longer retailer warranties than that. And, for an absolute bottom of the feature set appliance, a repair shop still exists
Re:A fridge from 70 years ago has better features than the f... by momirlan on Monday July 31, 2023 @01:50PM (#36946294)
maybe in your universe. i lost count of appliances that failed after 1 year, where the vendor is asking for all sorts of pictures and then declares "it's not covered by warranty". repairing such item comes from own pocket, and -if possible - it's usually comparable to paying for it again
Re:A fridge from 70 years ago has better features than the f... by maccard on Monday July 31, 2023 @03:33PM (#36947647)
For something like a fridge, vacuum, dishwasher, washing machine they're all lasting substantially more than a year, even at the bottom of the market. If you're talking about a £20 blender then... yeah, I guess?
Re:A fridge from 70 years ago has better features than the f... by ilyt on Tuesday August 01, 2023 @07:11AM (#36954641)
What is "your universe" then ? Name and shame
Re:A fridge from 70 years ago has better features than the f... by momirlan on Tuesday August 01, 2023 @04:21PM (#36962172)
Kenmore stove by Sears, Samsung dryer, same Instant Pot (they filed for bankruptcy later :-)
Re:A fridge from 70 years ago has better features than the f... by LegitShady on Monday July 31, 2023 @10:04AM (#36942633)
Sure but how can I code an ai bot that lives in your fridge and analyzes your shopping habits, and sells that to the highest bidder? Maybe with amazon grocery integration so that it sends your groceries before you even knew you needed them. And Microsoft Tay integration! Ask your fridge questions and have it answer, in a hilariously racist fashion! New Andrew Tate plugins sold as DLC.
Re:A fridge from 70 years ago has better features than the f... by jxramos on Monday July 31, 2023 @10:08AM (#36942703)
No thank you.
Re:A fridge from 70 years ago has better features than the f... by PaulDavisThe1st on Monday July 31, 2023 @11:03AM (#36943680)
> Fridge is a box of cold stuff. I don't need much more than that.

The entire premise of TFA is essentially that you're wrong.

Re:A fridge from 70 years ago has better features than the f... by Phrenzy on Monday July 31, 2023 @11:22AM (#36943975)
I would rather not require the use of my FIDO key to obtain an ice bream sandwich.
Re:A fridge from 70 years ago has better features than the f... by sokoloff on Monday July 31, 2023 @12:39PM (#36945223)
> ice bream sandwich

That amusing typo sounds absolutely disgusting.

Re:A fridge from 70 years ago has better features than the f... by PaulDavisThe1st on Monday July 31, 2023 @02:12PM (#36946587)
not really to do with keys etc.

boxes with different humidity levels.

shelves: slideout, adjustable height, rotating

humidity control/air circulation

lighting

door panel-only opening (saves energy)

utility of door-back shelf space

It's a lot more than "a box full of cold stuff".

Re:A fridge from 70 years ago has better features than the f... by amluto on Monday July 31, 2023 @10:31AM (#36943100)
> new stuff that came out in the last 20 years.

There isn’t really that much of this. Let’s consider an oven:

Good temperature control: accurate, precise and reliable temperature sensors (e.g. thermocouples) have been around for a long time, as have switching devices that are plenty high speed to make an excellent oven. PID control would be easy with 1980 technology or current technology. Ovens with good temperature control are nonetheless rare.

Forced convection (aka a fan): no new technology required. And they’ve been around for years.

Direct outdoor exhaust: this was available in the 80s and 90s. Not sure where it went.

Good insulation: nothing fancy here. Mineral wool and fiberglass have been around for a long time. Even silicone rubber gaskets that tolerate oven temperature are not particularly new.

Touch screens: most of them are still worse than the old analogue controls.

Steam with good controls: this is pretty new and very rare.

I suspect most of what’s going on is that fancy appliance makers try to keep BOM cost very low and that helps and whistles sell appliances. (Compare a $1500 induction cooktop to a $7k fancy brand gas cooktop. I suspect the BOM cost on the induction unit is rather higher. The gas unit has some cheap brass or bronze castings (I think I read somewhere that those burners cost under $20), a potentially shiny piece of stainless steel sheet, and really cheap controls. The obvious safety mechanism to turn off the gas if the burner isn’t lit? Nonexistent. The only thing $7k buys you is a nice brand name and maybe slightly more solid construction than a much cheaper unit.)

Re:A fridge from 70 years ago has better features than the f... by PaulDavisThe1st on Monday July 31, 2023 @11:06AM (#36943733)
> The only thing $7k buys you is a nice brand name and maybe slightly more solid construction than a much cheaper unit.)

Typically you also get: more BTUs, better simmer control, easier repairability (due to construction design).

I'm not arguing it's worth the money (which is why I got my $15k stove from craigslist for $2k :)

Re:A fridge from 70 years ago has better features than the f... by kjkjadksj on Monday July 31, 2023 @11:28AM (#36944099)
Three things that hardly matter for thousands. You can still boil water and simmer with the cheap stove. My parents stove is probably well over two decades old and never needed a repair for anything. I imagine a techician will have an easier time repairing a basic gas range where all the parts are generic compared to getting the miele certified mechanic out or whatever.
Re:A fridge from 70 years ago has better features than the f... by rsynnott on Monday July 31, 2023 @11:46AM (#36944407)
People who are just boiling water and simmering probably aren't buying the expensive stove, tho.
Re:A fridge from 70 years ago has better features than the f... by amluto on Monday July 31, 2023 @01:16PM (#36945808)
more BTU: BTU on a gas stove is ridiculous — they are so lossy that the flame pattern is a bigger deal.

better simmer control: even a lot of expensive gas stoves have fairly bad simmer

repairability: I regrettably own a fancy Thermador stove that is hard to repair — extracting the crappy ignition units requires a special tool that has been discontinued.

If you want excellent temperature control, get a Breville Control Freak. It outperforms everything else (generally by far), it’s offensively expensive at $1500, and it’s also cheap at $1500 if you think of it as the best stove that just happens to have only one burner.

You’ll also discover that 1800W (~6100 BTU/hr) is about right for most purposes with pans up to 12-14" at near 100% efficiency. You do not want 15000 BTU/hr delivered to your pan for any purpose other than boiling water or maybe reducing a big stock if you are stirring actively.

Re:A fridge from 70 years ago has better features than the f... by PaulDavisThe1st on Monday July 31, 2023 @02:15PM (#36946635)
> You do not want 15000 BTU/hr delivered to your pan for any purpose other than boiling water

Wok afficionados may differ with you here. I get by on 10k BTU/hr.

Re:A fridge from 70 years ago has better features than the f... by rsynnott on Monday July 31, 2023 @11:42AM (#36944343)
Yeah, ovens last more or less forever, and haven't had significant efficiency gains in a long time. They're probably the thing you're least likely to want to replace. There's often far more of an incentive with, say, fridges; if you have a 20 year old one, the replacement will likely pay for itself in a few years in power savings.

> The obvious safety mechanism to turn off the gas if the burner isn’t lit? Nonexistent.

... Wait, surely these are mandatory ~everywhere by now?

EDIT: Huh. Apparently they are _not_ required in the US (except maybe in apartment buildings) and are not common there. Weird; they're not very expensive.

Maybe it's an American Rugged Individualism thing. While I find the flame failure devices in my gas stove extremely irritating (they're particularly conservative, and won't reliably acknowledge that there's a flame until about 5 seconds after it's lit) I recognise that they are for my own good; this is probably very European thinking, though :)

Re:A fridge from 70 years ago has better features than the f... by sokoloff on Monday July 31, 2023 @12:45PM (#36945312)
I'm trying to think how I would reliably prove flame in a way that would resistant to annoying false negatives in the face of a very low simmer. (Somewhat ironically, this is probably the most important setting for which you'd need it. I'm not in any real danger of having a full-bore gas burner go out. I am in danger of having the lowest possible simmer blow out undetected.)

Over a long enough period of time, a sufficiently sensitive raw temperature sensor is probably good enough, but that's not likely to be cheap nor reliable/long-lasting.

Re:A fridge from 70 years ago has better features than the f... by amluto on Monday July 31, 2023 @01:21PM (#36945877)
Wow. I have literally never seen a flame failure device on a residential stove in the US.

I’ve seen them on gas fired ovens with pilot lights. (Don’t get a gas fired oven with a pilot light. As far as I can tell, they have no redeeming features unless you like the broiler hidden under some of them. They make for pretty bad ovens, and they suck for indoor air quality.)

Re:A fridge from 70 years ago has better features than the f... by rsynnott on Tuesday August 01, 2023 @05:20AM (#36954043)
For whatever reason, while gas stoves are fairly common in Ireland (I think they are in decline now, as induction offers most of the same advantages, along with its own), gas oven are practically non-existent; haven't seen one in years.

Didn't realise they were still a thing in the US, though it makes _sense_, I suppose; on a 110V system an electric oven is going to be a more expensive wiring job than on a 230V one.

Re:A fridge from 70 years ago has better features than the f... by schnable on Monday July 31, 2023 @10:38AM (#36943242)
My house came with a Subzero Fridge from 1989. Works like a champ and has a great layout. The only feature I miss from the late model LG I had at my last house is on-door water and ice. The SZ has an interior ice maker that works great though. Hope it lasts another 30 years!
Re:A fridge from 70 years ago has better features than the f... by trwired on Monday July 31, 2023 @10:06AM (#36942665)
Which is fine by me. I need a fridge to cool things down, oven to heat them up and TV to show moving pictures, all without access to wifi and other bells and whistles modern appliances come with. Just the basic stuff that those appliances could handle 20 years ago. More doesn't always translate to better.
Re:A fridge from 70 years ago has better features than the f... by maccard on Monday July 31, 2023 @10:38AM (#36943237)
20 years ago with fridges is a bit of a funny one because by then most had gotten rid of the nasty CFC's. But, even at that, it looks like today's fridges are _orders of magnitude_ more efficient to run than those from about 15-20 years ago.

For an oven and hob, the basics haven't changed, but my previous flat had a $600 oven that was silent, leaked practically no heat, preheated in a couple of minutes and came with nest features like an auto switch off. My new home has a range from about 15 years ago that cost 3x that, takes 20 minutes to preheat, has massive cool spots in the oven, and is noisier than my dishwasher.

For TV's, 20 years ago we were using CRT's to drive 480 vertical lines for the most part. Nowadays, you can get a 1080p HDR led TV for $200 that used 1/3 of the power of the CRT.

Re:A fridge from 70 years ago has better features than the f... by sokoloff on Monday July 31, 2023 @12:54PM (#36945450)
> it looks like today's fridges are _orders of magnitude_ more efficient to run than those from about 15-20 years ago

15-20 year old fridges are about 35% less energy efficient than the best modern fridges, not 100x. We just haven't made that much progress in refrigerants, compressors, nor insulation.

It looks like very efficient fridges today use about 400kWh per year. Those are the best (not the average).

In the late 90s, the overall average (not best) figure was ~850 kWh/yr and from the early 2000s (20 years ago), it was ~550kWh/yr.

A 15-20 year old average fridge is about 35% less energy efficient (550/400 - 1) than the best modern fridges.

Re:A fridge from 70 years ago has better features than the f... by maccard on Monday July 31, 2023 @04:01PM (#36947986)
> 15-20 year old fridges are about 35% less energy efficient than the best modern fridges, not 100x

I apologise that you took orders of magnitude literally. I'll settle for an entire order of magnitude really. I think it's _way_ more than 35%, though.

> It looks like very efficient fridges today use about 400kWh per year. Those are the best (not the average).

Where did you get that number from? Here's [0] a $220 fridge that advertises at 90 kWh. I found another that claims 61 kWh, but it's $1800 so I left it. 20 years ago is a very specific timeframe, if you go back 25 years you're also likely talking about removing a bunch of horriffic CFC's which were widespread at the time. I'm finding it hard to find numbers for that time frame though, the only ones I can find are early 90's claims of 1700+kWh/year.

But yes, I concede, we have not had a 100x improvement in energy efficiency in 20 years. The entire rest of my post stands, and I think we've seen a 10x improvement in efficiency. At today's electricity price in the UK, the savings from a 550 kWh fridge to the one I linked above would pay for the fridge in a little over a year. Said fridge is under guarantee for 2 years in the EU/UK, so it's a _guaranteed_ cost saving over that time period.

[0] https://ao.com/product/rl170d4bwe-hisense-fridge-white-80358...

Re:A fridge from 70 years ago has better features than the f... by sokoloff on Monday July 31, 2023 @04:19PM (#36948199)
I Googled "most efficient refrigerator 2023" and landed on https://shrinkthatfootprint.com/most-energy-efficient-refrig...

I then Googled "refrigerator annual energy consumption 2000" and landed on https://blog.arcadia.com/much-electricity-refrigerator-uses/

BTW, your link [0] is to a mini-fridge (without a freezer section), not a full-size fridge. It claims 132 liter capacity, while a full-size fridge tends to be 550 to 700 liters (4 to 5 times the size). If you're going to compare a mini-fridge to a full-size fridge/freezer in order to try to win an internet argument, enjoy your trophy.

[0] - https://ao.com/product/rl170d4bwe-hisense-fridge-white-80358...

Re:A fridge from 70 years ago has better features than the f... by maccard on Monday July 31, 2023 @04:47PM (#36948564)
132L isn't a "mini" fridge, it's an under counter fridge. 700L is... utterly enormous and I don't think I've ever seen a 700L fridge in real life. Most of the fridges I'm finding on AO are in the 1-200 kWh range, honestly
Re:A fridge from 70 years ago has better features than the f... by dublin on Monday July 31, 2023 @05:33PM (#36949172)
Utter Bullshit! Today's refrigerators are no more efficient than those from decades ago. In fact, the older, banned refrigerants are often more efficient, since their refrigerants were optimally designed and selected for maximum performance/efficiency in the first place! (And engineers were much better then, too. Really. Plus, I assure you that Thermodynamics has not changed in the interim!)

I'm sure my 35 y.o. Freon refrigerator is pretty much identically efficient to a modern one. The biggest difference is that mine is still running beautifully halfway through its 4th decade, while all the latest Chinese-sht-tech refrigerators will be unfixably dead in about five years at the outside. People should consider that* environmental and efficiency advantage!

Re:A fridge from 70 years ago has better features than the f... by PaulDavisThe1st on Monday July 31, 2023 @11:06AM (#36943748)
> TV to show moving pictures, all without access to wifi

You watch network TV ??? In 2023 ???

Re:A fridge from 70 years ago has better features than the f... by Arrath on Monday July 31, 2023 @01:52PM (#36946320)
While I appreciate that joke (and likewise can't stand the ad loading of modern tv), OP may well use a stream box like a chromecast, roku, or firestick, or even a game console to do their watching through a plain dumb tv.
Re:A fridge from 70 years ago has better features than the f... by pikahumu on Monday July 31, 2023 @10:03AM (#36942616)
And which of those things coming out in the last 20 years do people actually need? Wifi-enabled fridge? I'd rather have the features from that b/w clip.
Re:A fridge from 70 years ago has better features than the f... by hotpotamus on Monday July 31, 2023 @09:59AM (#36942570)
Well, I'll be the cranky old man today - I just want a box that keeps my food cold enough not to hurt me. That's really all I need and I imagine all I will need 20 years from now.
Re:A fridge from 70 years ago has better features than the f... by 3cats-in-a-coat on Monday July 31, 2023 @10:03AM (#36942617)
You don't even want to tweet from your fridge? Dude.
Re:A fridge from 70 years ago has better features than the f... by melx on Monday July 31, 2023 @10:06AM (#36942666)
Or self order from that big e-commerce that does tax avoidance. You're missing out.
Re:A fridge from 70 years ago has better features than the f... by FirmwareBurner on Monday July 31, 2023 @10:13AM (#36942797)
You mean Xeet from your fridge?
Re:A fridge from 70 years ago has better features than the f... by dh2022 on Monday July 31, 2023 @12:43PM (#36945280)
(I read this as "exit from your fridge". I LOL'ed - what happened that you got inside the fridge to begin with??? :))
Re:A fridge from 70 years ago has better features than the f... by FirmwareBurner on Monday July 31, 2023 @12:54PM (#36945462)
I read "Xeet" as "shieet"
Re:A fridge from 70 years ago has better features than the f... by callalex on Monday July 31, 2023 @02:29PM (#36946825)
How else would you survive a direct blast from a nuclear bomb? (I am referencing the absolutely absurd scene from Indiana Jones and the Crystal Skull)
Re:A fridge from 70 years ago has better features than the f... by srgpqt on Monday July 31, 2023 @10:00AM (#36942591)
“Improvements”. Sure, sure.
Re:A fridge from 70 years ago has better features than the f... by goodpoint on Monday July 31, 2023 @11:00AM (#36943609)
With appliances lasting <5 years we are way below the sweet spot.
Re:A fridge from 70 years ago has better features than the f... by 0xdeadbeefbabe on Monday July 31, 2023 @11:16AM (#36943886)
Making a fridge last 100 years seems like an R&D activity though. They can sell it as a subscription too.