News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:AI search of Neanderthal proteins resurrects ‘extinct’ an... by nerdponx on Monday July 31, 2023 @07:14AM (#36940996)
We've also been using the term Machine Learning for a long time to try to avoid this. Using "AI" where "ML" would suffice is just trying to cash in on recent hype for clicks.

Still an interesting result of course.

Re:AI search of Neanderthal proteins resurrects ‘extinct’ an... by fluidcruft on Monday July 31, 2023 @08:47AM (#36941790)
My understanding is "ML" came into existence after the term "AI" became an untouchable and disrespectful dirty word in academia after a previous hype cycle went bust. Statisticians wouldn't be caught dead working on "AI". See also xkcd purity scale (435).
Re:AI search of Neanderthal proteins resurrects ‘extinct’ an... by Kye on Monday July 31, 2023 @10:00AM (#36942579)
It looks like machine learning took over in the 2010s after a long convergence starting in the 2000s.

https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=artificial+int...

This is from published books, so probably less affected by popular narratives. For that, we have Google Trends!

It looks like they trade places repeatedly when constrained to news searches: https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?cat=5&date=all_2008...

Re:AI search of Neanderthal proteins resurrects ‘extinct’ an... by nerdponx on Monday July 31, 2023 @10:12AM (#36942779)
Right. ML is less likely to arouse emotions in either direction.
Re:AI search of Neanderthal proteins resurrects ‘extinct’ an... by 6D794163636F756 on Monday July 31, 2023 @05:04PM (#36948794)
It's also a refinement on the term. AI can include a lot while ML is much more specific.
Re:AI search of Neanderthal proteins resurrects ‘extinct’ an... by jjcon on Tuesday August 01, 2023 @02:51AM (#36953127)
Not really though it may seem that way. Not all AI is ML. There are a ton of things within AI such as planning algorithms or Expert Systems. Again those are under the academic discipline of AI but not in the subfield of ML.