Re:Time.is
by phillmv on Sunday March 11, 2012 @03:31PM
(#3691038)
*inspects the page
Yeah, you're right. That's not so bad.
It just seemed like it was claiming a lot of precision that, from my own experience of javascript, browsers and network latency, seemed a bit over the top. (Granted, on the order of magnitude of seconds, I'll accept that. Less than 100 ms and I grow suspicious).
Yeah, you're right. That's not so bad.
It just seemed like it was claiming a lot of precision that, from my own experience of javascript, browsers and network latency, seemed a bit over the top. (Granted, on the order of magnitude of seconds, I'll accept that. Less than 100 ms and I grow suspicious).