News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Time.is by dfc on Sunday March 11, 2012 @03:09PM (#3690983)
All things considered it is not such a bad estimate of the time. It looks like it makes it queries the local clock three times to get an estimation of the clock deltas and network delay . Why do you think 1.8 seconds is wrong? What is your ntpq billboard?
Re:Time.is by phillmv on Sunday March 11, 2012 @03:31PM (#3691038)
*inspects the page

Yeah, you're right. That's not so bad.

It just seemed like it was claiming a lot of precision that, from my own experience of javascript, browsers and network latency, seemed a bit over the top. (Granted, on the order of magnitude of seconds, I'll accept that. Less than 100 ms and I grow suspicious).

Re:Time.is by dfc on Sunday March 11, 2012 @03:38PM (#3691057)
what does your machine say for "ntpq -p" and "ntptime"?