News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:X tells advertisers to spend $1k per month or risk losing... by ozfive on Wednesday July 26, 2023 @09:39PM (#36887771)
Got my popcorn right here...
Re:X tells advertisers to spend $1k per month or risk losing... by aio2 on Wednesday July 26, 2023 @09:53PM (#36887859)
From 8 to 1000... that's quite the jump.
Re:X tells advertisers to spend $1k per month or risk losing... by selbyk on Wednesday July 26, 2023 @11:42PM (#36888661)
Twitter Blue was always $1000 for organizations, wasn't it? Only $8 for individuals
Re:X tells advertisers to spend $1k per month or risk losing... by smotched on Wednesday July 26, 2023 @11:55PM (#36888732)
Yup technically its free if they spend 1k...they get all the value from the 1k worth of ads plus the gold checkmark
Re:X tells advertisers to spend $1k per month or risk losing... by nomel on Thursday July 27, 2023 @01:08AM (#36889165)
So, this only impacts businesses spending less than $1k on ads? I'm curious what percent accounts, and percent spend, that is. An AM radio ad run will cost you more than that.
Re:X tells advertisers to spend $1k per month or risk losing... by AndrewKemendo on Wednesday July 26, 2023 @10:46PM (#36888270)
The spam in my timeline and likes from obvious bots is magnitudes higher than even a few months ago.

So I’m not sure why advertisers would want to increase spend there

Re:X tells advertisers to spend $1k per month or risk losing... by matteoraso on Wednesday July 26, 2023 @11:13PM (#36888458)
What is with this obsession over bots? If anything, a horde of bots that seem identical to humans could be a good way of artificially boosting metrics, and it's not even illegal because Twitter didn't create or encourage people to create these bots.
Re:X tells advertisers to spend $1k per month or risk losing... by abrookewood on Thursday July 27, 2023 @12:24AM (#36888888)
It's just an excuse.
Re:X tells advertisers to spend $1k per month or risk losing... by kalleboo on Wednesday July 26, 2023 @11:43PM (#36888665)
My employer was looking into testing advertising on Twitter, and the $1000 cost to entry was a hard stop on that. Seems like a very poor policy.
Re:X tells advertisers to spend $1k per month or risk losing... by smotched on Wednesday July 26, 2023 @11:54PM (#36888726)
Thats false, you can spend $20 if you want, you just wont get the gold checkmark
Re:X tells advertisers to spend $1k per month or risk losing... by seattle_spring on Thursday July 27, 2023 @12:42AM (#36889002)
Dang you are super duper passionate about defending twitter.

Maybe parent feels that the optics of being an “unverified” advertiser is about as good as not advertising at all, therefore the de-facto minimum is indeed $1k.

Re:X tells advertisers to spend $1k per month or risk losing... by nomel on Thursday July 27, 2023 @01:03AM (#36889131)
As a third party person who has never had a Twitter account, I don't think someone pointing out something that's easily verified as being false, as stated, is "defending twitter".
Re:X tells advertisers to spend $1k per month or risk losing... by seattle_spring on Friday July 28, 2023 @12:59PM (#36909834)
How about when they have a 2-year long post history that exclusively pushes back against Twitter and Elon criticism?
Re:X tells advertisers to spend $1k per month or risk losing... by midoridensha on Thursday July 27, 2023 @06:44AM (#36891645)
I think it's a great policy. Hopefully Elon will raise the price another tenfold or more.
Re:X tells advertisers to spend $1k per month or risk losing... by snapcaster on Thursday July 27, 2023 @02:26PM (#36898075)
Why?
Re:X tells advertisers to spend $1k per month or risk losing... by fortyseven on Friday July 28, 2023 @09:23AM (#36906414)
Presumably to hasten the exodus.
Re:X tells advertisers to spend $1k per month or risk losing... by kjs3 on Wednesday July 26, 2023 @11:43PM (#36888670)
"We'd hate something bad to happen to your business...I'm sure there's a way you can make sure that doesn't happen...". So basically they're adopting the Yelp playbook.
Re:X tells advertisers to spend $1k per month or risk losing... by midoridensha on Thursday July 27, 2023 @06:45AM (#36891655)
Isn't Twitter the place where your company's ad is likely to be placed next to, for instance, a porn site's ad? Why would anyone want to advertise there these days?
Re:X tells advertisers to spend $1k per month or risk losing... by abrookewood on Thursday July 27, 2023 @12:24AM (#36888881)
Sounds a lot like a protection racket ...
Re:X tells advertisers to spend $1k per month or risk losing... by anon373839 on Thursday July 27, 2023 @02:25AM (#36889680)
I noticed today that the X logo is very, very similar to the Xs in Forever 21’s store signage (“XXI Forever”).

https://www.simon.com/mall/northshore-mall/stores/xxi-foreve...

I guess this makes Elon’s company Forever 10? Which kind of tracks...

Re:X tells advertisers to spend $1k per month or risk losing... by penjelly on Thursday July 27, 2023 @06:56AM (#36891733)
isnt it a literal unicode character?
Re:X tells advertisers to spend $1k per month or risk losing... by TechTechTech on Thursday July 27, 2023 @08:43AM (#36892588)
Yes it is 𝕏 (U+1D54F, Mathematical Double-Struck Capital X)
Re:X tells advertisers to spend $1k per month or risk losing... by anon373839 on Thursday July 27, 2023 @10:50AM (#36894466)
Just a lame attempt at humor on my part. :)
Re:X tells advertisers to spend $1k per month or risk losing... by andeee23 on Thursday July 27, 2023 @04:07AM (#36890429)
i guess you can call that… Xtortion
Re:X tells advertisers to spend $1k per month or risk losing... by sillywalk on Thursday July 27, 2023 @04:28AM (#36890591)
X tells advertisers to spend $1k per month to not have their ads placed next to open anti-Semites, fascists, anti-vax conspiracies, unless Elon Musk posts or retweets them, or decides to not pay the bills.
Re:X tells advertisers to spend $1k per month or risk losing... by rchaud on Thursday July 27, 2023 @08:53AM (#36892674)
All this will do is change the spam vector from paid ads injected into your feed, to self-promoting tweets in the comments section, where $8 blue checks get top blling.