Re:X tells advertisers to spend $1k per month or risk losing...
by kalleboo on Wednesday July 26, 2023 @11:43PM
(#36888665)
My employer was looking into testing advertising on Twitter, and the $1000 cost to entry was a hard stop on that. Seems like a very poor policy.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:X tells advertisers to spend $1k per month or risk losing...
by smotched on Wednesday July 26, 2023 @11:54PM
(#36888726)
Thats false, you can spend $20 if you want, you just wont get the gold checkmark
Re:X tells advertisers to spend $1k per month or risk losing...
by seattle_spring on Thursday July 27, 2023 @12:42AM
(#36889002)
Dang you are super duper passionate about defending twitter.
Maybe parent feels that the optics of being an “unverified” advertiser is about as good as not advertising at all, therefore the de-facto minimum is indeed $1k.
Re:X tells advertisers to spend $1k per month or risk losing...
by nomel on Thursday July 27, 2023 @01:03AM
(#36889131)
As a third party person who has never had a Twitter account, I don't think someone pointing out something that's easily verified as being false, as stated, is "defending twitter".
Re:X tells advertisers to spend $1k per month or risk losing...
by seattle_spring on Friday July 28, 2023 @12:59PM
(#36909834)
How about when they have a 2-year long post history that exclusively pushes back against Twitter and Elon criticism?
Re:X tells advertisers to spend $1k per month or risk losing...
by midoridensha on Thursday July 27, 2023 @06:44AM
(#36891645)
I think it's a great policy. Hopefully Elon will raise the price another tenfold or more.
Re:X tells advertisers to spend $1k per month or risk losing...
by snapcaster on Thursday July 27, 2023 @02:26PM
(#36898075)
Why?
Re:X tells advertisers to spend $1k per month or risk losing...
by fortyseven on Friday July 28, 2023 @09:23AM
(#36906414)
Presumably to hasten the exodus.