News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Fall of Stack Overflow by stavros on Tuesday July 25, 2023 @04:52AM (#36859699)
And it's always the result I want.
Re:The Fall of Stack Overflow by OJFord on Tuesday July 25, 2023 @05:00AM (#36859763)
Then consider using DDG & '!w term', or some other method (searching Wikipedia, extension, I think Firefox has something engine-agnostic built-in) instead?
Re:The Fall of Stack Overflow by stavros on Tuesday July 25, 2023 @05:01AM (#36859774)
Oh I do use DDG. I think it might suffer from the same problem, actually, since now I'm wondering why I see Wikipedia results very far down in Google when I don't really use Google.
Re:The Fall of Stack Overflow by prmoustache on Tuesday July 25, 2023 @01:51PM (#36866446)
The comment above mention using !w in your search to look only in wikipedia since you say it is nearly always what you are looking for.

I would say at this point you could just use wikipedia as your default search engine.

Re:The Fall of Stack Overflow by stavros on Tuesday July 25, 2023 @02:00PM (#36866617)
Yeah, I do do that for those things, but when I don't, I've noticed a decline in quality.
Re:The Fall of Stack Overflow by TRiG_Ireland on Tuesday July 25, 2023 @07:09AM (#36860594)
You can add a keyword search in Firefox.