News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The IBM mainframe: How it runs and why it survives by hermitdev on Monday July 24, 2023 @11:05AM (#36849183)
> DB2 runs on Linux The DBA's I interned with would yell at you for this claim. They'd say UDB runs on Linux, but DB2 only runs on z/OS.

I worked with both DB2 & UDB during my internship 2 decades ago, and while largely compatible with core SQL functionality, that changed quickly after you got off the "normal" path. UDB was released at a much faster cadence, and if you developed to the latest features of UDB, you'd often find yourself unable to deploy against DB2.

A few of my last projects as an intern: 1) storing BLOB objects in DB2 from a .Net app and 2) porting an "interactive" batch-processed COBOL app to ASP.Net form 3) getting DB2 Connect clustering on windows working (I never did get this working despite spending an entire summer on the phone with IBM support).

I've some fond memories of working with the mainframe. Like the time I managed to crash the entire development LPAR with a specific SQL query that broke the DB2 query optimizer... The phone call from the NOC was immediate and went something along the lines of "I don't know what you did, but don't do it again, you just took down all of development". Development was something like +10k users...

Re:The IBM mainframe: How it runs and why it survives by ibiza on Monday July 24, 2023 @01:23PM (#36851357)
Re DB2 vs UDB, thank you, it's been too long. Well done breaking DB2!

We actually targeted Oracle on Unix. Fortunately, the app developers never got too deep into DB2-isms, so it worked out fine.

Re:The IBM mainframe: How it runs and why it survives by radiator on Monday July 24, 2023 @03:27PM (#36853084)
From z/OS to Oracle. Good Lord!
Re:The IBM mainframe: How it runs and why it survives by rvba on Monday July 24, 2023 @06:02PM (#36854871)
What company had 10k developers on a mainframe?
Re:The IBM mainframe: How it runs and why it survives by hermitdev on Tuesday July 25, 2023 @04:56PM (#36869381)
It'd probably be more accurate to say users than developers on the LPAR. I won't name names, though. It was at a Fortune 500, though. Manufacturing sector, not finance.