News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:To Save the Planet, Should We Be Moving Slower? by gruez on Friday July 21, 2023 @11:14PM (#36822834)
>I think it's because capitalism ...

That's why communist countries are known for their carbon neutral economies, and being excellent stewards of the environment, right?

Re:To Save the Planet, Should We Be Moving Slower? by ssabev on Friday July 21, 2023 @11:31PM (#36822947)
Yeah and human rights and happiness, etc, etc.

Source: product of 2 former commie countries. The after effects probably take 50+ years to undo

Re:To Save the Planet, Should We Be Moving Slower? by ElectricalUnion on Friday July 21, 2023 @11:49PM (#36823058)
No communist country exists, and most likely one will never exist. Calling countries "communist" is supposed to be a capitalist joke on communism being a unreacheable utopia.
Re:To Save the Planet, Should We Be Moving Slower? by gruez on Saturday July 22, 2023 @12:07AM (#36823147)
Suppose thats true. Then what explains the behavior of "communist" (but not True Communist) countries? They're polluting just like capitalist countries. Are they just undercover capitalists?
Re:To Save the Planet, Should We Be Moving Slower? by ansmithz42 on Saturday July 22, 2023 @12:28AM (#36823259)
What explains the "communist" countries behaviour is "Animal Farm". The "communist" countries are just a variant of Monarchies. They have replaced some of the birth-rite of monarchies but it is still the same with all the behind the scenes power plays and purges.
Re:To Save the Planet, Should We Be Moving Slower? by ElectricalUnion on Monday July 24, 2023 @10:06AM (#36848231)
> Suppose thats true.

A communist society would entail the absence of private property, social classes, money and the state. No stable, large scale "society without state" exists in the modern world.

Re:To Save the Planet, Should We Be Moving Slower? by goatlover on Saturday July 22, 2023 @12:35AM (#36823299)
Well then a planned command-style economy instead of a free market using Marxism as it's motivating principle. I'm guessing most of the western critics of capitalism aren't tankies, so they probably have in mind some sort of democratic ownership of production where people choose degrowth over profit. To the extent that's doable at the scale of nations is unproven. Potential problem is someone like Stalin or Mao will always subvert the movement for their own personal power.