Re:IMAX emulates PalmPilot software to power Oppenheimer’s 7...
by grumpyprole on Friday July 21, 2023 @05:37PM
(#36820185)
Consider also that resolution is only one factor. Bandwidth is another. Digital movies are often full of compression artefacts, especially when there's a lot going on in the scene.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:IMAX emulates PalmPilot software to power Oppenheimer’s 7...
by CobsterLock on Friday July 21, 2023 @06:10PM
(#36820619)
As far as I know, movie theaters do not compress video. Its seems like they have a digital surrogate for movie reals
Re:IMAX emulates PalmPilot software to power Oppenheimer’s 7...
by smitelli on Friday July 21, 2023 @06:55PM
(#36821086)
That's true; with a cap of 250 Mbps for the DCP stream, and a 4K frame size of 4096 × 2160, that's ~28 bits per pixel (if the soundtrack is disregarded). There might be a small amount of subsampling or run length encoding going on, but it's entirely plausible to distribute and play an uncompressed film on a professional projector.
EDIT: Forgot to factor frame rate into the math. Divide that by 24 frames per second. That got me curious, so I looked into it and found they're using JPEG 2000 on each frame with no inter-frame deltas. Essentially like a constant stream of I-frames.
Re:IMAX emulates PalmPilot software to power Oppenheimer’s 7...
by tehnub on Friday July 21, 2023 @07:02PM
(#36821156)
From that link, it looks like they do compress and use JPEG2000 for it, with a max bit-rate of 250 mbit/s. IIRC 4k blu rays don't do more than 100 mbit/s, so that's quite a bit better.