News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Ten Years of “Go: The Good, the Bad, and the Meh. Parent comment

Re:Ten Years of “Go: The Good, the Bad, and the Meh by tsss on Tuesday July 18, 2023 @02:37PM (#36777282)
Go has "swept up entire markets" because they have an unlimited marketing budget. It has nothing to do with the merits of the language itself.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Ten Years of “Go: The Good, the Bad, and the Meh by philosopher1234 on Tuesday July 18, 2023 @02:47PM (#36777427)
Can you point to something Go has spent this hypothetical marketing budget on?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Ten Years of “Go: The Good, the Bad, and the Meh by pjmlp on Tuesday July 18, 2023 @05:02PM (#36779056)
Docker, Kubernetes and key CNCF projects.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Ten Years of “Go: The Good, the Bad, and the Meh by philosopher1234 on Tuesday July 18, 2023 @06:19PM (#36779831)
What was the marketing investment here..?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Ten Years of “Go: The Good, the Bad, and the Meh by pjmlp on Wednesday July 19, 2023 @01:22AM (#36782391)
Google is using Go to implement Kubernetes.

Kubernetes is cool, I want to play with Kubernetes.

Maybe I should lean Go to play.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Ten Years of “Go: The Good, the Bad, and the Meh by philosopher1234 on Wednesday July 19, 2023 @04:18PM (#36792582)
Ok, but calling this a marketing spend that has nothing to do with the language seems ridiculous.
[ Parent | on HN ]