[1] https://theweek.com/articles/470330/birth-control-human-righ...
So I search for the report itself: https://www.unfpa.org/sites/default/files/pub-pdf/AR%202012%...
And the claim is nowhere near the one you are making. What the UNFPA (who can't even declare anything a human right, by the way) is saying is:
>Family planning is anchored in respect for human rights, women’s empowerment, and social justice and quality.
And
>In October, UNFPA published its annual The State of World Population report, which made the case that family planning is a basic human right that unlocks unprecedented rewards for women in terms of health, economic power and gender equality.
Putting medical barriers to access the pill is by no means whatsoever a violation of human rights.
Whether one agrees or disagrees with this, the argument is not strong enough to warrant a prescription requirement.
(Also and separately: human bodies are complex. If you talk to a few women you might discover that IUDs are not universally tolerated and condoms are not an acceptable substitute for a variety of reasons. There are good reasons many women choose to take oral contraceptives, even though they have a daily use requirement.)
This isn't just about kids, it's also about the inconvenience and added cost (to pay for the doctor visits) placed on all women who use oral contraceptives. I'm not sure how it relates at all to this announcement.
The pill is simply one of the safest options on the market. It's not perfect, but it's generally super well tolerated.
[1] https://www.consumersafety.org/medical-device-lawsuits/miren...