News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Apple VisionOS Simulator streaming wirelessly to Meta Que... by langsoul-com on Tuesday July 11, 2023 @01:59AM (#36676926)
I think Zuckerberg did mention they already explored the same things. Must have made a conscious decision not to due to production costs.

Only Apple can charge a high premium and still have others pay

Re:Apple VisionOS Simulator streaming wirelessly to Meta Que... by monero-xmr on Tuesday July 11, 2023 @02:39AM (#36677205)
They can charge a premium because they never sacrificed quality in any systemic way (obviously you can comment with your pet issues but the bottom line is that they kept the quality bar very high).

Some immediately jump to Harvard MBA teachings that caused this, or capitalism, whatever. In my opinion a deep focus on quality is rare in any business. It is very hard to scale and keep in your DNA. One reason small businesses continue to be formed and attract customers (beyond “buy local” pandering) is that solid small businesses are run by dictators that create an entity that is an extension of themselves, sacrificing nothing. Therefore they can charge a premium.

I patronize businesses that maintain their quality and I pay for it. Life is too short and I have too much spare cash not to. Apple achieves such standards. You may have to upgrade hardware every few years but that’s part of the price.

Re:Apple VisionOS Simulator streaming wirelessly to Meta Que... by as_bntd on Friday July 14, 2023 @04:53PM (#36729791)
Sorry but could you mention some of these other business you talked about?
Re:Apple VisionOS Simulator streaming wirelessly to Meta Que... by astrange on Tuesday July 11, 2023 @03:44AM (#36677708)
It's cheaper than HoloLens.
Re:Apple VisionOS Simulator streaming wirelessly to Meta Que... by bob-09 on Tuesday July 11, 2023 @10:23AM (#36681390)
You're not wrong. $3499 Vision Pro vs $3500 HoloLens 2.