I guess we'll just have to feel that the other is wrong as we wait to see what happens, but I'm betting on existing US regulation and basic human behavior. That's a tall order to bet against.
I agree that copyright is done for in an age of generative models, and as a pirate I'm kind of rooting for it, but i'm not so sure it's unequivocally a Good Thing. I'm interested to understand history better, how art and science was produced and distributed before the legal fiction of intellectual property. the point of allowing someone a monopoly on their work is to share it with the public, same as patents. without the legal framework, the way to protect your work may be to not publish it at all, which is where I see the internet going from here, private enclaves that go to great lengths to prevent LLMs from drinking their milkshake.
If you'd please review https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html and stick to the rules when posting here, we'd appreciate it.
Fortunately, copyright as we know it is dead. It will die a death of a thousand cuts from people not giving a shit about stodgy old[0] people like you that are trying to retard the progress of science and the arts. It won't make a difference if you respond with some clever counterargument here. The future is here and it jettisoned the atavistic nonsense.
[0]: Stodgy and old is a state of mind. If you're actually young, then I'm so sorry for you.