News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Twitter Traffic Tanking by meepmorp on Sunday July 09, 2023 @05:25PM (#36659070)
I wonder what that number looks like over a longer timeframe
Re:Twitter Traffic Tanking by 3cats-in-a-coat on Sunday July 09, 2023 @05:43PM (#36659237)
There may have been a spike in interest in Twitter around October 2022, when Musk bought it. And this is now coming down to the "usual". But I think it's not just that. Would be curious to see trend from last 24 mo as well.

This is the CEO of Cloudflare BTW. He wouldn't post this as bait for the likes. I believe at the very least he finds this a reasonable and telling trend.

Re:Twitter Traffic Tanking by meepmorp on Sunday July 09, 2023 @08:10PM (#36660441)
Yeah, I recognized the guy's name and know he hangs out here sometimes. Maybe we'll actually find out.
Re:Twitter Traffic Tanking by rsynnott on Sunday July 09, 2023 @08:45PM (#36660667)
Apparently not; see https://blog.cloudflare.com/radar-2022-year-in-review/ (Social Media Services section)
Re:Twitter Traffic Tanking by kelseyfrog on Sunday July 09, 2023 @06:11PM (#36659484)
Dropping from 32nd to 40th in rank downplays the impact when website traffic is most likely Pareto-distributed.
Re:Twitter Traffic Tanking by 3cats-in-a-coat on Sunday July 09, 2023 @06:51PM (#36659861)
Well, treat it as another data point. The biggest issue Twitter is facing yet is the fact it's losing billions a year and no solution in sight to mitigate those losses.
Re:Twitter Traffic Tanking by cbeach on Sunday July 09, 2023 @06:18PM (#36659541)
Looks like everyone’s going get the leftwing echo chamber and Zuckopoly they seem to want so badly.
Re:Twitter Traffic Tanking by chownie on Sunday July 09, 2023 @06:39PM (#36659740)
There's a third option in which Elon gives up Twitter to less emotional management who will hopefully undo some of the platform destructive choices he took.

There's a reason people don't use Voat, reading blue badge twitter is very reminiscent of that.

Re:Twitter Traffic Tanking by hattmall on Sunday July 09, 2023 @06:55PM (#36659898)
People don't use voat because it shutdown 2 years ago... Voat had an extremely poorly designed server architecture that cost about 100x what they needed and had frequent outages. The founders were very unreceptive to suggestions and IIRC even wanted to make the site costly to maintain because they thought it would look good to investors.
Re:Twitter Traffic Tanking by chownie on Sunday July 09, 2023 @07:17PM (#36660091)
The problem was never any site architecture issues.

No one used Voat because it was a link aggregator for shrieking hatred and people uncivil enough to get banned from any platform with etiquette rules.

Re:Twitter Traffic Tanking by acdha on Sunday July 09, 2023 @08:19PM (#36660508)
I think you’re both right at different levels: the only way a pariah site can survive is by being cheap enough that a few dedicated people can fund it – 4chan/8chan stuck around for years despite no sensible investors or advertisers wanting to be seen anywhere near them because their operating costs didn’t require huge resources. Sites like Voat or Truth Social, and now Twitter, suffer because they try to be like mainstream platforms but can’t generate the same kind of revenue.
Re:Twitter Traffic Tanking by olliej on Sunday July 09, 2023 @06:36PM (#36659701)
Oh look here today’s idiot
Re:Twitter Traffic Tanking by pityJuke on Sunday July 09, 2023 @06:44PM (#36659783)
So my option is to choose Elon's right wing echo chamber? (Of course, one doesn't have to pick Threads - the ultimate outcome on Twitter's traffic is the same.)

The Blue echo-chamber* is so, so much worse.

* Because Elon has become politicized, paying for Twitter Blue has become politicized. Because of this, the people paying for Blue are people politically aligned with Elon. As Twitter Blue replies are boosted to the top of any reply section, there is an inherent echo-chamber in Twitter replies these days.

Re:Twitter Traffic Tanking by xenospn on Sunday July 09, 2023 @07:01PM (#36659954)
You know what? I was just talking to my mom and she kept asking ”When are we finally going to get that left-wing echo chamber we've been talking about all these years?”
Re:Twitter Traffic Tanking by toyg on Sunday July 09, 2023 @06:18PM (#36659543)
Well, mission accomplished, no? Wasn't the point of all the new restrictions, to reduce scraping and so on?

In other words, the operation completed successfully, and the patient is dying.

Re:Twitter Traffic Tanking by SebJansen on Monday July 10, 2023 @01:57AM (#36662626)
mission failed successfully

you are being saved, please do not resist

Re:Twitter Traffic Tanking by willcipriano on Sunday July 09, 2023 @06:27PM (#36659617)
Roblox.com is apparently in the top domains
Re:Twitter Traffic Tanking by suddenclarity on Sunday July 09, 2023 @07:38PM (#36660225)
Interesting that the source lists 30% of measured traffic to be bots.
Re:Twitter Traffic Tanking by nunez on Sunday July 09, 2023 @11:35PM (#36661765)
Hold up; how is nitter back up???
Re:Twitter Traffic Tanking by 3cats-in-a-coat on Monday July 10, 2023 @05:00AM (#36663736)
In part probably because:

1. Twitter is showing individual tweets without login again.

2. It also spills out user profile pages and some other details if you go through the tweet embedding format, but also if you add some headers in requests for normal pages (like declaring you're Googlebot).

The way Twitter's changes are implemented are haphazard and quickly worked around. Not to mention partially reverted after user outcry.

It's all just Elon Musk noise. This is not how you run a company.

Re:Twitter Traffic Tanking by archo on Tuesday July 11, 2023 @10:40AM (#36681654)