News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The internet's “town square” is dead by lobf on Sunday July 09, 2023 @02:28PM (#36657396)
Okay buddy. Masks absolutely help reduce the spread of particulates but you can pretend that’s not true if you want.
Re:The internet's “town square” is dead by c_crank on Sunday July 09, 2023 @02:33PM (#36657437)
Masks do reduce the spread of particulates by some amount. Reducing the spread of particulates by some amount has a negligible impact on the spread of COVID 19 and other respiratory viruses. To believe otherwise is, again, misinformation.
Re:The internet's “town square” is dead by lobf on Sunday July 09, 2023 @03:13PM (#36657849)
Re:The internet's “town square” is dead by c_crank on Sunday July 09, 2023 @03:34PM (#36658049)
That link reaffirms that masks reduce particulates by some amount and offers no evidence this impacts the spread of respiratory illnesses.
Re:The internet's “town square” is dead by lobf on Sunday July 09, 2023 @04:30PM (#36658555)
lol it literally says that masks reduce the spread of COVID. By all means, provide some evidence to the contrary
Re:The internet's “town square” is dead by c_crank on Sunday July 09, 2023 @04:46PM (#36658706)
The most obvious and trivial answer is that countries implementing mask mandates have seen COVID become endemic. That masks provide 'some' impact is obvious. That said impact is negligible is also obvious. We are still waiting, years and years latter, for that curve to finally be flattened.
Re:The internet's “town square” is dead by lobf on Sunday July 09, 2023 @05:39PM (#36659199)
So no data, cool. I will no longer believe Johns Hopkins and will instead defer to you for medical advice because obviously you’ve made a seriously compelling argument.
Re:The internet's “town square” is dead by immanentize on Monday July 10, 2023 @03:44AM (#36663230)
Curve flattening was about trying not to overwhelm the hospitals.
Re:The internet's “town square” is dead by Timon3 on Monday July 10, 2023 @04:56AM (#36663699)
You're making a basic logic error that I've seen so many times from your camp: "if it doesn't work 100% it doesn't work at all". Why do you think this is a logical requirement?

> That said impact is negligible is also obvious

No, it's not obvious in any way. Please show us.