News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Buying Apple’s Vision Pro headset could require an appoin... by kcplate on Sunday July 09, 2023 @10:11AM (#36654583)
So the killer app for a $3.5k product is an app that helps you buy other expensive products from the same company?

Maybe I misunderstood, but if not count me skeptical.

Re:Buying Apple’s Vision Pro headset could require an appoin... by macintux on Sunday July 09, 2023 @10:14AM (#36654600)
Not the app, the retail presence. The Apple Stores have proved enormously valuable when Apple enters a new hardware product category.
Re:Buying Apple’s Vision Pro headset could require an appoin... by kcplate on Sunday July 09, 2023 @03:49PM (#36658178)
I can understand this being a differentiator to other AR/VR products, but that is not exactly what the comment I replied to said, they said the “killer app” was the ability to buy it at an Apple Store. Short of a few folks with too much extra cash and curiosity, just being able to try it before you buy isn’t what I would refer to as a killer app. The “killer app” is what gets the main market populace to the store to even consider it.
Re:Buying Apple’s Vision Pro headset could require an appoin... by danpalmer on Sunday July 09, 2023 @10:24AM (#36654676)
I’m squarely in the target market for the Meta Quest, but the fact I have no way of trying one before I buy, even just for a few minutes, is my main blocker for getting one.

This is particularly important for a) new product categories where customers aren’t yet sure they want/need it, b) products that “fit”, or don’t, and c) expensive entertainment products. These headsets are all three, so it’s really important.

Apple’s retail presence could solve this.

Re:Buying Apple’s Vision Pro headset could require an appoin... by dharmab on Sunday July 09, 2023 @10:29AM (#36654718)
Meta has a free 30 day return policy
Re:Buying Apple’s Vision Pro headset could require an appoin... by danpalmer on Sunday July 09, 2023 @12:46PM (#36656065)
That's typical for most products like that but it doesn't solve the problem. The issue is only partly "will I like it" or "will it fit me", for which a free return policy can help (but not fully solve), but a lot of the issue is "why would I want this". If you walk past one in a shop and can give it a go you're much more likely to overcome that than spending £300 on one and having to go through the return process.

Aside, I hear a lot more about free returns from people in the US. In the UK they are seemingly near-universal, but there is significantly less willingness to return outside of specific categories such as clothing. I have a little experience working in a retailer (as a software engineer), and US return rates were far higher than UK/EU return rates, and this was apparently considered typical.

Re:Buying Apple’s Vision Pro headset could require an appoin... by mcpackieh on Sunday July 09, 2023 @11:55PM (#36661883)
I've bought underwear with a longer return period.
Re:Buying Apple’s Vision Pro headset could require an appoin... by scarface_74 on Sunday July 09, 2023 @01:21PM (#36656439)
The entire purpose of the Apple Stores were to be a showcase where Apple controlled the narrative.

It has been one of Apple’s competitive advantages since 2001.

How many people are going to spend $3500 on a device that by definition you have to try on in person to see if you want it?

Re:Buying Apple’s Vision Pro headset could require an appoin... by starcraft2wol on Monday July 10, 2023 @12:19AM (#36662040)
Are you not familiar with the iOS ecosystem?