Dropbox doesn’t have a competitor that is free to use. At least as far as I know. You can get your disk space in a lot of ways, some bundled with other products you may use making it appear “free” but even if you host your own cloud storage you’re going to pay something for it.
Even if Evernote is better than notes on your iPhone, is it $10 a month better? Probably not.
Google drive?
You can also get some free MBs from Microsoft, Proton and so on, and, Dropbox also has a free tier.
However, Dropbox have some underrated yet very powerful features like Apps and automations. I buy books from plethora of places, and new versions of the products I have are uploaded automatically. I just receive a notification. Same for some fonts and design assets I have. SendOwl leverages this capability for anyone, easily.
Auto organization, a clunky but reliable native Linux application, LANSync, etc. are all good things to have, and they have solved the syncing problem.
Also, Google Drive is a ticking time bomb, because if you accidentally put a file Google doesn't like, you have the risk to lose all your Google access at the middle of the night.
Dropbox costs €10 / user / month while Google Drive costs $12 / user / month.
- Dropbox: $119.88 per year for 2TB, plus $39.99 per year for one year version history.
- Google Drive: ~$11.3 per year for 2TB, ~$57 per year for 5TB.
Not in the U.S., btw.Maybe not completely free, but iCloud desktop sync is pretty much a native MacOS clone of Dropbox. Especially for its core feature of cross-device syncing. Perhaps less so for sharing, although MacOS has been slowly adding those features to the point where I no longer get much value out of dropbox at all.
Still paying though, mostly out of laziness to migrate (which is literally as simple as dragging the files into a folder on my desktop, honestly I’m not sure why I haven’t done this yet)
It's why I ended up switching to OneDrive. (Which I ended up paying for later.)
That’s an odd framing. How about “when they didn’t support the filesystem I use”?
If some software is only available on Windows I doubt anyone would say that the vendor is trying to “dictate what OS I use”.
To be clear it is trivial to thwart the check, but shared library shims can't fix the real problem which is pointless corporate contempt. Particularly if I'm paying for it.
Put another way, do you think the combined users of file systems which aren’t supported ext4, xfs, btrfs, or zfs are willing to pay more or would quietly accept the possibility of data loss? I doubt the former is true and have absolute certainty that if there was a bug using an unsupported file system that would result in angry, hyperbolic blog posts saying Dropbox is unsafe and will lose your data.