News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:No One Is Happy About Diversity Efforts at Work by AmericanChopper on Monday July 03, 2023 @09:09AM (#36572360)
This “pure meritocracy” argument simply boils down to the fact that it’s not possible to build a system that perfectly measures how prospective candidates will perform in the future. Really, all businesses and institutions should be free to innovate their own methodologies for doing that, and live with whatever consequences they produce, with the governments role being to regulate the limits of permissible discrimination. Race has been a class legally protected from discrimination for quite some time now, and it’s honestly pretty sad that it’s taken this long to get a ruling on this open and unapologetic racial discrimination.
Re:No One Is Happy About Diversity Efforts at Work by 307sar on Monday July 03, 2023 @09:54AM (#36572911)
Well said. At least the first part. Allow private institutions sink or swim on their agenda. If you can discriminate against any and every one coming into your home, then a private institution should be able to discriminate against any and anyone coming into their property.
Re:No One Is Happy About Diversity Efforts at Work by AmericanChopper on Monday July 03, 2023 @10:08AM (#36573083)
Well I don’t think that’s true. You should be allowed to racially discriminate about who’s allowed to come into your home. Employers and universities should not be allowed to racially discriminate about who they employ/admit.

My point is simply that the “perfect meritocracy doesn’t exist” argument is pointless. Screening candidates is a problem for businesses to solve, and the only metric they should be incentivised to optimise for is the outcomes produced for the institution/business.