News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:OpenAI sued for $3B after allegedly trampling privacy wit... by andsoitis on Thursday June 29, 2023 @10:23AM (#36520739)
That’s the economics of (non-symbolic) AI. To work, it needs humans to create stuff for free.

Putting it more bluntly, it is somewhere between a parasite and a slave driver.

Re:OpenAI sued for $3B after allegedly trampling privacy wit... by ben_w on Thursday June 29, 2023 @10:43AM (#36521038)
It doesn't require humans to work for free — while that's been a common default MO since everyone looked at Google making a search index and thinking to themselves "if they're doing it surely do can we", there are data sets made by paying people.
Re:OpenAI sued for $3B after allegedly trampling privacy wit... by mrtranscendence on Thursday June 29, 2023 @10:48AM (#36521125)
There are such datasets, and AI companies absolutely pay to have data curated. But I suspect it would be just unimaginably expensive to create a dataset from scratch with enough tokens to feed a model with hundreds of billions of parameters, all the while paying every participant fairly.
Re:OpenAI sued for $3B after allegedly trampling privacy wit... by ben_w on Thursday June 29, 2023 @10:55AM (#36521237)
"fair" is somewhat undefined, as the fair-looking number for being paid for effort can be very different to the fair-looking number for being paid for the resale value of the end product on an open market.

I wonder what would an LLM trained on Google code and internal documents look like?