News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Show HN: PFAS.report – Measure the forever chemicals in y... by mdrew on Wednesday June 28, 2023 @02:45PM (#36510731)
I think for certain high risk populations, specifically pregnant women or women planning on becoming pregnant, it makes sense.

Based on the new clinical recommendations, my 10.86 ng/mL level puts me at elevated risk for preeclampsia (if I were a women/pregnant). Knowing that could mean my BP during pregnancy is more closely monitored, with a BP cuff for example.

Re:Show HN: PFAS.report – Measure the forever chemicals in y... by prepend on Wednesday June 28, 2023 @02:53PM (#36510853)
> I think for certain high risk populations, specifically pregnant women or women planning on becoming pregnant, it makes sense.

Does it though? What will a pregnant woman do based on her results? Will having PFAS affect someone’s decision about becoming pregnant?

Pregnant women are going to monitor BP anyway. And the intervention is $100 for a BP cuff so that’s cheaper than the test. So we’re better off just recommending monitoring BP more closely than this test.

Re:Show HN: PFAS.report – Measure the forever chemicals in y... by mdrew on Wednesday June 28, 2023 @03:23PM (#36511313)
Since this is an out of pocket test not covered by medicaid/medicare, I don't know if the value based care argument is that relevant. I know what you're saying though.

The value we provide: If people want to know, they can now know.

I also think not making the test accessible also has downsides.

Re:Show HN: PFAS.report – Measure the forever chemicals in y... by prepend on Wednesday June 28, 2023 @08:44PM (#36514862)
It’s good the test is available.

What I mean is what would justify someone spending $400. The example of pregnancy is not a good one, as someone is better off just monitoring blood pressure (which is already common advice for all expectant mothers) for $100 instead of paying for this test.

I think value based healthcare is more important when people pay themselves.

Since there’s no intervention based on the results, it’s not a good idea for people until the results are actionable.

Re:Show HN: PFAS.report – Measure the forever chemicals in y... by 0cf8612b2e1e on Wednesday June 28, 2023 @02:56PM (#36510899)
Time to start blood letting. A human has ~5 liters of blood and blood donations are 0.5 liters, every two months. So with a year of effort, could cut your levels in half (0.9^6 = 53%).
Re:Show HN: PFAS.report – Measure the forever chemicals in y... by mdrew on Wednesday June 28, 2023 @03:07PM (#36511084)
I believe they let you donate every 6 weeks
Re:Show HN: PFAS.report – Measure the forever chemicals in y... by stepbeek on Wednesday June 28, 2023 @03:37PM (#36511504)
Depends on country. UK is every three months.
Re:Show HN: PFAS.report – Measure the forever chemicals in y... by ShakataGaNai on Wednesday June 28, 2023 @02:46PM (#36510754)
That's fair. So like any other testing, this is only useful for a small population, and you should consult your doctor first.
Re:Show HN: PFAS.report – Measure the forever chemicals in y... by mdrew on Wednesday June 28, 2023 @02:52PM (#36510846)
You'd want a good reason to test