Hey man I don't think it's necessarily bad what you're doing (like I said elsewhere, I like what ChatGPT has to say much of the time! Dunno enough about your post to comment on it itself tho).
But, readers are not going to react well if they read an article and then later find out it was AI-generated. You're also not being very slick about this -- you should be prompting ChatGPT to use a different voice than its own. You could be stitching together blog posts from multiple prompts, asking ChatGPT to challenge its own ideas, simulate a reader or editor conversing with the simulated author, etc... then you could blog about your process and hit HN #1 with a clear conscience - just an example. But as it is, it looks like content marketing spam you churned out in minutes.
Quite happy with this workflow because it helps me publish articles more frequently where I don't have to worry about stuff other than just dumping my thoughts in raw format.
Its similar to how I use Astro as a tool to generate static pages from these markdown files to easily deploy on web or TailwindCSS etc etc you get the point.
https://media.tenor.com/1PMq-CFZno4AAAAC/avengers-endgame-hu...