Yes, this seems like ChatGPT’s style of writing. Another post has a conclusion that matches ChatGPT’s conclusion style:

> Remember, namespaces are a powerful feature that requires careful configuration and management. With proper knowledge and implementation, you can harness the full potential of Linux namespaces to create robust and secure systems.

A clue from this post itself is that all the links were added to the intro because GPT won’t intersperse links throughout.

e:Softened my language since there’s no way to know, and w/e ChatGPT is smart anyway. Better to judge content on the merits anyway imo

chatGPT is amazing if you have not mastered the language you are writing in. its what it is for. give it some text, have it rewrite it. that its generated by it doesnt mean any content was produced by it. often ppl just use it to rephrase. imho thats what its for. (hard to tell tho which is which :D)

Likely generated and then edited.

I don't think author even tried running the command himself.

Yes that's the problem, Chat GPT isn't always right

Yep, I do use GPT as one of the tools in my workflow. I write these blogs in markdown locally and have a helper script which takes the raw content and with a prompt it helps me generate a title, summary, Intro and conclusion (personal preference to keep these consistent on all blogs) and proofread the whole raw content for any mistakes (replaces grammarly completely now).

Quite happy with this workflow because it helps me publish articles more frequently where I don't have to worry about stuff other than just dumping my thoughts in raw format.

Its similar to how I use Astro as a tool to generate static pages from these markdown files to easily deploy on web or TailwindCSS etc etc you get the point.

https://media.tenor.com/1PMq-CFZno4AAAAC/avengers-endgame-hu...

You might want to specify that on the title or in intro.

Noted. Although, adding that on top of each blog is very repetitive info and not specifically related to the blog. I will find a better place to add this info but will definitely add this by today, most likely under the `/uses/` page.

I would still put it in some prominent place, similar to how newspapers put "sponsored". I.e I wouldn't want unknowingly to read a blog written (in large part) by chatgpt and would feel deceived when it wasn't clear from the start.

> very repetitive info and not specifically related to the blog

Hey man I don't think it's necessarily bad what you're doing (like I said elsewhere, I like what ChatGPT has to say much of the time! Dunno enough about your post to comment on it itself tho).

But, readers are not going to react well if they read an article and then later find out it was AI-generated. You're also not being very slick about this -- you should be prompting ChatGPT to use a different voice than its own. You could be stitching together blog posts from multiple prompts, asking ChatGPT to challenge its own ideas, simulate a reader or editor conversing with the simulated author, etc... then you could blog about your process and hit HN #1 with a clear conscience - just an example. But as it is, it looks like content marketing spam you churned out in minutes.

Yah, the ChatGPT vibes are insane with not only this blog post, but some of his others.

I got really frustrated reading the article because most of the text felt like padding without actually explaining why these specific commands were necessary. Definitely felt like LLM output.