News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Doubts creep in about wisdom of ‘no-kids zones’ in South ... by logicchains on Sunday June 25, 2023 @01:06PM (#36470367)
And the people arguing for white-only spaces said whites caused less property damage than certain other races.
Re:Doubts creep in about wisdom of ‘no-kids zones’ in South ... by warning26 on Sunday June 25, 2023 @01:17PM (#36470512)
And that’s related how? Choosing to have a kid (or a pet) is a choice, while race isn’t. Seems to me that’s a pretty major distinction.
Re:Doubts creep in about wisdom of ‘no-kids zones’ in South ... by jxidjhdhdhdhfhf on Sunday June 25, 2023 @01:25PM (#36470615)
Choosing to have a kid is a choice of the parents, not the child. You're forgetting the child is also a person, one as deserving of the same civil rights as anyone else, at least where we can give them without causing harm to the child.
Re:Doubts creep in about wisdom of ‘no-kids zones’ in South ... by Dma54rhs on Sunday June 25, 2023 @01:31PM (#36470677)
Are these serious opinions? I'm sure in America they said to black folk having kids is a choice as well - you can skip the discrimination by not having a new generation.
Re:Doubts creep in about wisdom of ‘no-kids zones’ in South ... by mcphage on Sunday June 25, 2023 @02:06PM (#36471026)
Being a child is not a choice. No-kid zones ban children, not parents.