It's cheaper to have no disability access than to have it. It's probably cheaper to exclude poor, black people from your property.

Too bad, when you live in a society, you have to deal with other people living in the society including those under the age of 18.

And the people arguing for white-only spaces said whites caused less property damage than certain other races.

And that’s related how? Choosing to have a kid (or a pet) is a choice, while race isn’t. Seems to me that’s a pretty major distinction.

Choosing to have a kid is a choice of the parents, not the child. You're forgetting the child is also a person, one as deserving of the same civil rights as anyone else, at least where we can give them without causing harm to the child.

Are these serious opinions? I'm sure in America they said to black folk having kids is a choice as well - you can skip the discrimination by not having a new generation.

Being a child is not a choice. No-kid zones ban children, not parents.