News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:US vendor accused of violating GDPR by reputation-scoring... by SilasX on Saturday June 24, 2023 @08:29PM (#36464054)
I wasn't making the comparison, I was correcting a misrepresentation you made about the US credit scoring system only penalizing you for not paying debts.
Re:US vendor accused of violating GDPR by reputation-scoring... by Manuel_D on Saturday June 24, 2023 @08:37PM (#36464096)
I never said the system only penalizes you for not paying debts:

> It's all based on your debts, and repayment of said debt.

Absence of credit history is based on your debt (or more specifically lack thereof).

Re:US vendor accused of violating GDPR by reputation-scoring... by SilasX on Saturday June 24, 2023 @08:42PM (#36464118)
And as written, someone that didn't already know about it would make a false inference about what kind of people would be marked as radioactive. I was pre-empting that (very likely) false inference. The fact that you didn't explicitly say the false thing (or that you can cleverly read "based on debts" to mean some non-obvious thing) doesn't obviate the need for that clarification.
Re:US vendor accused of violating GDPR by reputation-scoring... by Dylan16807 on Thursday June 29, 2023 @01:49PM (#36524028)
"Clarifications" shouldn't start with the word "No".

It might be non-obvious but the phrasing wasn't deceptive or "clever", it's the system that's weird.