Re:US vendor accused of violating GDPR by reputation-scoring...
by SilasX on Saturday June 24, 2023 @08:42PM
(#36464118)
And as written, someone that didn't already know about it would make a false inference about what kind of people would be marked as radioactive. I was pre-empting that (very likely) false inference. The fact that you didn't explicitly say the false thing (or that you can cleverly read "based on debts" to mean some non-obvious thing) doesn't obviate the need for that clarification.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:US vendor accused of violating GDPR by reputation-scoring...
by Dylan16807 on Thursday June 29, 2023 @01:49PM
(#36524028)
"Clarifications" shouldn't start with the word "No".
It might be non-obvious but the phrasing wasn't deceptive or "clever", it's the system that's weird.