Re:James Cameron slams OceanGate safety, regrets not speakin...
by rvba on Friday June 23, 2023 @07:11PM
(#36453490)
Dont they dive in a part of sea that is international, so no rules apply?
Re:James Cameron slams OceanGate safety, regrets not speakin...
by dragontamer on Friday June 23, 2023 @07:13PM
(#36453519)
The companies are incorporated in some country however. And ships that go out to sea must be flagged under some country, and those ships have to follow the rules/regulations of the country they're under.
Re:James Cameron slams OceanGate safety, regrets not speakin...
by falcolas on Friday June 23, 2023 @08:18PM
(#36454010)
And their failures cause those same countries non-trivial amounts of money.
Consider the Coast Guard and Navy efforts for this latest event.
Re:James Cameron slams OceanGate safety, regrets not speakin...
by nielsbot on Friday June 23, 2023 @09:38PM
(#36454583)
According to the news I read, Titan did not need to be classed/certified because it didn't launch from any port. Even if the mother ship did. I'll try to find the citation.
Re:James Cameron slams OceanGate safety, regrets not speakin...
by david38 on Saturday June 24, 2023 @02:17AM
(#36456089)
Why? You are comparing ships, which have passengers whose goal is to get somewhere (not necessarily be on a ship) and don’t self-identify as final-frontier risk takers with subs which are the exact opposite. Nobody takes a sub as regular or holiday transport. The point of the (non-military) sub is to go where almost nobody goes, where only a sub can go. And you don’t leave the sub.
Is it too onerous to require a ship have navigation lights and life jackets?
Subs should have at least some basic safety minimums.