Re:People paid to train AI are outsourcing their work to AI
by sidewndr46 on Thursday June 22, 2023 @01:00PM
(#36435234)
But that wasn't a scare. It's a real thing that made people ill with no cure.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:People paid to train AI are outsourcing their work to AI
by randomdata on Thursday June 22, 2023 @02:06PM
(#36436273)
Memory is feeble, but I remember it being a scare. People were genuinely worried about it; mostly because it was a real thing that potentially threatened them.
This doesn't seem like a scare. If GPT and the like start outputting increasingly nonsensical outputs (which, a lot of the time, that is the case already) due to tainted inputs, oh well?
Re:People paid to train AI are outsourcing their work to AI
by sangnoir on Thursday June 22, 2023 @02:18PM
(#36436469)
Quicksand is also a real and dangerous thing, but the media is not always proportionate in reporting the risks.
Re:People paid to train AI are outsourcing their work to AI
by pavlov on Thursday June 22, 2023 @03:28PM
(#36437452)
I didn’t mean to imply it wasn’t a real thing. (I’m not a native English speaker so I’m probably missing a nuance of “scare” beyond what appears to be its literal meaning of the general public being afraid.)
Re:People paid to train AI are outsourcing their work to AI
by sidewndr46 on Friday June 23, 2023 @10:33AM
(#36447323)
"scare" in English is often used to describe a public over-reaction to a perceived threat. In the US we had the "red scare" that was an over reaction to communists in the US.
A similar concept is the "satanic panic", the idea that all our children were being abducted by satanic cults.