Re:Debris field found in search for missing submersible
by buggythebug on Thursday June 22, 2023 @12:50PM
(#36435069)
Ya but even so they could have sent rescue ships there because "we think it could be here" - nothing given up.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Debris field found in search for missing submersible
by CoastalCoder on Thursday June 22, 2023 @12:53PM
(#36435119)
I could imagine a cost-benefit analysis making sense here.
- Pro: increased chance of saving a few people's lives
- Con: risk of leaking info about U.S. sonar sensitivity
I.e., the decision would depend on the magnitude of the "pro" and "con" probabilities.
Re:Debris field found in search for missing submersible
by WalterBright on Thursday June 22, 2023 @01:46PM
(#36435949)
If it imploded the chance of survival is zero.
Re:Debris field found in search for missing submersible
by aflag on Thursday June 22, 2023 @01:57PM
(#36436136)
If they detected an implosion there's no chance of saving anyone's lives. It would increase the chance of maybe finding bodies, though.
Re:Debris field found in search for missing submersible
by toss1 on Thursday June 22, 2023 @02:46PM
(#36436877)
Also - Pro: Excellent realistic training opportunity to maintain and upgrade skills
Re:Debris field found in search for missing submersible
by bell-cot on Thursday June 22, 2023 @03:29PM
(#36437461)
Audible-at-a-distance implosion ==>> Everyone inside is ~liquified
The actual Pro would be "minor calibration opportunity for our secret sensor network".
Re:Debris field found in search for missing submersible
by politician on Thursday June 22, 2023 @01:08PM
(#36435390)
It gives up bounds on how fast we can locate something.
Re:Debris field found in search for missing submersible
by buggythebug on Friday June 23, 2023 @10:35AM
(#36447351)
or don't announce anything and just find it