Debris field found in search for missing submersible

Re:Debris field found in search for missing submersible by CoastalCoder on Thursday June 22, 2023 @12:53PM (#36435119)

I could imagine a cost-benefit analysis making sense here.

- Pro: increased chance of saving a few people's lives

- Con: risk of leaking info about U.S. sonar sensitivity

I.e., the decision would depend on the magnitude of the "pro" and "con" probabilities.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Debris field found in search for missing submersible by WalterBright on Thursday June 22, 2023 @01:46PM (#36435949)

If it imploded the chance of survival is zero.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Debris field found in search for missing submersible by aflag on Thursday June 22, 2023 @01:57PM (#36436136)

If they detected an implosion there's no chance of saving anyone's lives. It would increase the chance of maybe finding bodies, though.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Debris field found in search for missing submersible by toss1 on Thursday June 22, 2023 @02:46PM (#36436877)

Also - Pro: Excellent realistic training opportunity to maintain and upgrade skills

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Debris field found in search for missing submersible by bell-cot on Thursday June 22, 2023 @03:29PM (#36437461)

Audible-at-a-distance implosion ==>> Everyone inside is ~liquified

The actual Pro would be "minor calibration opportunity for our secret sensor network".

[ Parent | on HN ]