Re:Bringing emulation into the 21st century (2021)
by datpiff on Wednesday June 14, 2023 @12:02PM
(#36327943)
Haha, I came here to make an "Is this a joke?" response
Re:Bringing emulation into the 21st century (2021)
by quenix on Wednesday June 14, 2023 @01:08PM
(#36329041)
Posted on April 1st :)
Re:Bringing emulation into the 21st century (2021)
by datpiff on Thursday June 15, 2023 @05:19AM
(#36338084)
> 2021-05-01
No it's not :)
Re:Bringing emulation into the 21st century (2021)
by masswerk on Wednesday June 14, 2023 @12:09PM
(#36328061)
Also mind:
> Alright, if you’ve got this far I’m sure you’ve realised that the whole project is something of a joke. That said it is also an interesting intellectual exercise to consider whether it’s remotely possible to achieve >=2MHz with the architecture delivered.
2MHz with an architecture, which is up to 21st century hypes, that would be some! ;-)
Re:Bringing emulation into the 21st century (2021)
by Sharlin on Wednesday June 14, 2023 @02:20PM
(#36330216)
"NodeJS developer refuses to believe that gigahertz means billion hertz" https://www.theolognion.com/nodejs-developer-refuses-to-beli...
Re:Bringing emulation into the 21st century (2021)
by masswerk on Wednesday June 14, 2023 @02:57PM
(#36330835)
Now, everybody knows that gigahertz is a generic unit for fast used by the Gig Economy, when they rent a user's processor for free by making them pay for a subscription!
(More correctly, it's a rating scale for user processors, like, Gig-A-rental, Gig-B-rental, etc. So, if you target 2.1 times Gig-A-rental class processor power available in the user base, which is also known as "Hertz" among insiders, you're targeting 2.1 GigAHertz.) ;-)
Re:Bringing emulation into the 21st century (2021)
by majormajor on Wednesday June 14, 2023 @03:37PM
(#36331403)
I was hoping this would be an actual confusion about "million million" billion vs "thousand million" - https://www.theguardian.com/notesandqueries/query/0,5753,-61... - I got very confused with my grandfather about this once.
Re:Bringing emulation into the 21st century (2021)
by masswerk on Wednesday June 14, 2023 @10:01PM
(#36335523)
Thank you! As a continental guy, I wasn't quite sure myself, when and how the UK joined this madness. In all fairness: adopting metric on the one hand, but also US billions on the other hand, is a bit odd, not to say, confusing… Is this the British idea of diplomacy? :-)
Re:Bringing emulation into the 21st century (2021)
by jvanderbot on Wednesday June 14, 2023 @02:36PM
(#36330513)
Oh they thought of that. Solution:
> Rewrite more things in rust.
Re:Bringing emulation into the 21st century (2021)
by jvanderbot on Wednesday June 14, 2023 @02:33PM
(#36330472)
> This culminated in the implementation of an 8080 microprocessor utilising a modern, containerised, microservices based architecture running on kubernetes with frontends for a CP/M test harness and a full implementation of the original Space Invaders arcade machine.
I actually WTF'd.
I got suspicious at this line:
> Secure by default (mTLS on all function calls)
I thought to myself, what does HTTPS/TLS have to do with writing an emulator, normally a local-only piece of software?