News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:“But the SEC let us go public” and other flawed arguments... by mthoms on Tuesday June 13, 2023 @01:25AM (#36305798)
Please don't post comments that don't contribute anything to the discussion.
Re:“But the SEC let us go public” and other flawed arguments... by KingOfCoders on Tuesday June 13, 2023 @01:34AM (#36305866)
Like yours? Don't want to sound snarky but either we have meta-comments or not. If yes, I'm fine, if not - and we use downvotes to moderate - then we don't.
Re:“But the SEC let us go public” and other flawed arguments... by mthoms on Tuesday June 13, 2023 @01:48AM (#36306000)
My comment pointed out that they outright refuse to state which ones fall into which category. That is a 100% factual statement and highly relevant to the discussion.

If you'd like to provide a rebuttal to that, be my guest. But childish swipes that don't address the point being made are just that... childish.

Re:“But the SEC let us go public” and other flawed arguments... by KingOfCoders on Tuesday June 13, 2023 @02:06AM (#36306136)
I can't see

"Please don't post comments that don't contribute anything to the discussion."

as highly relevant to the discussion.

Re:“But the SEC let us go public” and other flawed arguments... by Dylan16807 on Tuesday June 13, 2023 @02:08AM (#36306150)
Defending a bad meta comment is the worst option of all.
Re:“But the SEC let us go public” and other flawed arguments... by KingOfCoders on Tuesday June 13, 2023 @06:35AM (#36308156)
In my value system, killing people is the worst option of all, but bad meta comments are close second.