Re:“But the SEC let us go public” and other flawed arguments...
by mthoms on Tuesday June 13, 2023 @01:25AM
(#36305798)
Please don't post comments that don't contribute anything to the discussion.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:“But the SEC let us go public” and other flawed arguments...
by KingOfCoders on Tuesday June 13, 2023 @01:34AM
(#36305866)
Like yours? Don't want to sound snarky but either we have meta-comments or not. If yes, I'm fine, if not - and we use downvotes to moderate - then we don't.
Re:“But the SEC let us go public” and other flawed arguments...
by mthoms on Tuesday June 13, 2023 @01:48AM
(#36306000)
My comment pointed out that they outright refuse to state which ones fall into which category. That is a 100% factual statement and highly relevant to the discussion.
If you'd like to provide a rebuttal to that, be my guest. But childish swipes that don't address the point being made are just that... childish.
Re:“But the SEC let us go public” and other flawed arguments...
by KingOfCoders on Tuesday June 13, 2023 @02:06AM
(#36306136)
I can't see
"Please don't post comments that don't contribute anything to the discussion."
as highly relevant to the discussion.
Re:“But the SEC let us go public” and other flawed arguments...
by Dylan16807 on Tuesday June 13, 2023 @02:08AM
(#36306150)
Defending a bad meta comment is the worst option of all.
Re:“But the SEC let us go public” and other flawed arguments...
by KingOfCoders on Tuesday June 13, 2023 @06:35AM
(#36308156)
In my value system, killing people is the worst option of all, but bad meta comments are close second.