Did you consider that maybe the reason this proposal was written was because this mutation was the most likely way this kind of virus could mutate to infect humans? Think about it.

I don’t understand why people keep throwing around all kind of unsubstantiated facts like if they suddenly made things clearer. The situation is overall pretty clear. Could the pandemic be linked to an accidental leak from a gain-of-function study at the Wuhan lab? Most certainly. Do we have evidence that it did? No, we don’t. Could it come from somewhere else? Sure, it can. Was there a properly done inquiry with full collaboration from the lab and the host country? Absolutely not, China was extremely uncooperative and did all it could to control the narrative surrounding the pandemic.

Who in a right mind (just leaving for a moment how) would do that? As: create a separate strain of coronavirus just to introduce one specific mutation.

Incorrect. We need to determine what happened based on all the evidence. We can't just make stuff up to fill in the blanks.

i.e. If what we know doesn't contain facts essential to the determination, we can't just "think about it" harder.

That's the hard-hitting evidence that was missing.

And that's why this topic is so taboo and annoying. People turn coincidence into proof.

Clearly, you have an agenda that encourages people to stop looking at facts and instead to make things up they don't have answers for.

Think about it. (This means I'm right, right? This means if you don't agree with me, you aren't thinking, right?)