News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Reddit founders made hundreds of fake profiles so site looked popular (2012). Parent comment

Re:Reddit founders made hundreds of fake profiles so site lo... by lelandfe on Sunday June 11, 2023 @05:58PM (#36286155)
IANAL. For the US, users grant Reddit a license to use their content when they post it. The users still own that content. Reddit's license does not extend to your reuse of it[0], nor have the underlying users directly granted you permission, so it would not be legal (in the US) for you to reuse like that.

[0] "you may not... license, sell, transfer, assign, distribute, host, or otherwise commercially exploit the Services or Content" https://www.redditinc.com/policies/user-agreement-september-...

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Reddit founders made hundreds of fake profiles so site lo... by RobotToaster on Sunday June 11, 2023 @06:21PM (#36286322)
Wouldn't that mean it would be down to the individual users who still own each bit of content to issue a DMCA takedown if they objected?

I imagine the number of such requests would be small.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Reddit founders made hundreds of fake profiles so site lo... by lelandfe on Sunday June 11, 2023 @06:29PM (#36286385)
Posting that you’re going to be “using Reddit data to pre-seed the content” may make it a bit harder to dodge Reddit in court.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Reddit founders made hundreds of fake profiles so site lo... by scosman on Sunday June 11, 2023 @06:57PM (#36286592)
Ah. The old “I did so much copyright violation it would be infeasible for everyone I took content from to enforce” defence. I see nothing that could go wrong.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Reddit founders made hundreds of fake profiles so site lo... by danielheath on Sunday June 11, 2023 @06:17PM (#36286300)
Although prompting “write a comment replying to the text ‘<snip> in the style of u/landfe“ would yield something I copyrightable…
[ Parent | on HN ]