‘Attractive women 16% more likely to secure startup funding’

Re:‘Attractive women 16% more likely to secure startup funding’ by lucaspfeifer on Thursday June 08, 2023 @10:43AM (#36242670)

Nepotism means hiring friends or family. The advantage there is that you start out with a greater level of trust, depending on how long you've known the person. This must be weighed against the disadvantage that there are likely more skilled individuals to be found. When dealing with delicate matters (i.e. when small mistakes cause big problems), reliability becomes more important.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:‘Attractive women 16% more likely to secure startup funding’ by anlaw on Thursday June 08, 2023 @11:11AM (#36243171)

There’s a lot of examples out there where hiring family was a complete flop. Show data trust in family is rational and not just low effort.

I think you’re making up a narrative that sounds roughly technical, roughly contemporary wisdom but is 100% primate throwing BS.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:‘Attractive women 16% more likely to secure startup funding’ by paulddraper on Thursday June 08, 2023 @11:39AM (#36243731)

Hiring family is questionable.

Hiring former work associates (friends) is more solid.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:‘Attractive women 16% more likely to secure startup funding’ by lucaspfeifer on Saturday June 10, 2023 @08:29PM (#36276792)

What if the family member is looking for their first job and is well trained?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:‘Attractive women 16% more likely to secure startup funding’ by lucaspfeifer on Saturday June 10, 2023 @08:34PM (#36276821)

Most people trust their families more than their work acquaintances. Still, the family member must have more than trust, to do a good job in a skilled profession.

Proof? I'm not going to spend the effort to cite data here, since we have no prior relationship.

[ Parent | on HN ]