Re:Google doesn’t want employees working remotely anymore
by tomcam on Thursday June 08, 2023 @03:36AM
(#36238488)
So wait what is this livable city of 80,000?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Google doesn’t want employees working remotely anymore
by htag on Thursday June 08, 2023 @10:50AM
(#36242812)
If you have an answer to this question don't spill the beans. Many cities livable at 80k will find themselves unlivable if they hit 160k in 15 years.
Re:Google doesn’t want employees working remotely anymore
by sh34r on Thursday June 08, 2023 @06:49PM
(#36250331)
I have zero interest in putting where I’m at anymore on the map than it already is. Such places are vanishingly rare in the US, and incredibly common in Europe. It’s very frustrating.
However, in the interest of shaking everyone off my trail, I will mention that there’s many affordable, walkable towns and cities outside Philly and Chicago that were built up 100 years along the commuter railroads. In the absence of zoning-related tyranny, transit oriented development happens naturally. Look for towns and cities that were built before 1945, before we paved paradise and put up a parking lot.
Re:Google doesn’t want employees working remotely anymore
by Apocryphon on Saturday June 17, 2023 @12:39AM
(#36367332)
We already know about Bloomington