News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:uBlock Origin 1.50.0 by belter on Wednesday June 07, 2023 @12:03PM (#36228668)
I am even more amazed, about companies paying for ads, while seeming to ignore most users will not see them as they use adblocks plugins.
Re:uBlock Origin 1.50.0 by lkbm on Wednesday June 07, 2023 @12:14PM (#36228852)
https://www.statista.com/topics/3201/ad-blocking/#topicOverv... suggests adblocker usage was around 26% in the US [2020], which is much higher than I would have guessed, but still well under 50%.
Re:uBlock Origin 1.50.0 by jjulius on Wednesday June 07, 2023 @12:09PM (#36228756)
>... most users will not see them as they use adblocks plugins.

Forgive my ignorance, but is there data around what percentage of browsers has an adblocker installed? I am inclined to assume that a tech-focused forum such as HN is going to use them at a much more disproportionate rate relative to the average, non-tech-savvy joe, and therefore further assume that they're not as widely adopted as we might think.

I could totally be wrong, though.

Edit: 42.7% globally, but it varies by country. The US, for instance, only sees 38.8% adoption.[1] Hardly what I would call "most".

[1]https://backlinko.com/ad-blockers-users

Re:uBlock Origin 1.50.0 by jart on Wednesday June 07, 2023 @03:18PM (#36232042)
42.7% is unbelievably huge. Can the tech economy even survive if half the people are taking free rides? For the longest time it was no more than 10% since only the technical class used the things. Nowadays corporate and government policymakers are requiring adblockers be installed on normies computers.
Re:uBlock Origin 1.50.0 by rjmalagon on Wednesday June 07, 2023 @12:16PM (#36228876)
I see ad blockers as good filters for them. Someone that feels annoyed by ads to the extent of making the effort to install ad blockers is not a good target for ads too. Less tech-savvy and caring users are perfect targets for ads.
Re:uBlock Origin 1.50.0 by psychphysic on Wednesday June 07, 2023 @12:06PM (#36228714)
They won't be paying for content that wasn't loaded.
Re:uBlock Origin 1.50.0 by belter on Wednesday June 07, 2023 @12:16PM (#36228881)
Is that true in all cases?

It seems for example for Cost-per-mille (CPM) advertising if a user has an ad-blocker, they will not see the ad, but it would still count towards the number of impressions if the ad request is made?

Re:uBlock Origin 1.50.0 by psychphysic on Wednesday June 07, 2023 @12:22PM (#36228991)
The ad space is dominated by a few companies and all do that as far as I know.

The other dominating ad space is spliced into videos and they certainly know you will skip around if you can on YouTube.

> If a request is made

It won't be made that's what adblockers do. Or it won't land in the case of pihole/DNS level blockers.

Otherwise it wouldn't speed up browsing and tracking would continue unhindered.

Re:uBlock Origin 1.50.0 by ElectricalUnion on Wednesday June 07, 2023 @01:08PM (#36229775)
There's some adblockers focused on disrupting tracking and those will both intentionally load ads and automatically click on every one of them for you.

https://adnauseam.io/

Re:uBlock Origin 1.50.0 by psychphysic on Wednesday June 07, 2023 @01:19PM (#36229926)
Neat idea, I'd worry that the tracking is worse than the benefit.

That said I routinely let long YouTube ads play while I go off to do something else. Personal best was circa 1.5hour ad!

Someone told me that costs them big bucks so long as it's not skipped.