News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:uBlock Origin 1.50.0 by psychphysic on Wednesday June 07, 2023 @12:06PM (#36228714)
They won't be paying for content that wasn't loaded.
Re:uBlock Origin 1.50.0 by belter on Wednesday June 07, 2023 @12:16PM (#36228881)
Is that true in all cases?

It seems for example for Cost-per-mille (CPM) advertising if a user has an ad-blocker, they will not see the ad, but it would still count towards the number of impressions if the ad request is made?

Re:uBlock Origin 1.50.0 by psychphysic on Wednesday June 07, 2023 @12:22PM (#36228991)
The ad space is dominated by a few companies and all do that as far as I know.

The other dominating ad space is spliced into videos and they certainly know you will skip around if you can on YouTube.

> If a request is made

It won't be made that's what adblockers do. Or it won't land in the case of pihole/DNS level blockers.

Otherwise it wouldn't speed up browsing and tracking would continue unhindered.

Re:uBlock Origin 1.50.0 by ElectricalUnion on Wednesday June 07, 2023 @01:08PM (#36229775)
There's some adblockers focused on disrupting tracking and those will both intentionally load ads and automatically click on every one of them for you.

https://adnauseam.io/

Re:uBlock Origin 1.50.0 by psychphysic on Wednesday June 07, 2023 @01:19PM (#36229926)
Neat idea, I'd worry that the tracking is worse than the benefit.

That said I routinely let long YouTube ads play while I go off to do something else. Personal best was circa 1.5hour ad!

Someone told me that costs them big bucks so long as it's not skipped.