News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Messages that can only be understood under the influence ... by LoganDark on Tuesday June 06, 2023 @01:57PM (#36216649)
To be fair, I understand why they're skeptical. A brain's perception of itself is imperfect, and sometimes completely made-up. (Actually, one could make the argument that all perception is completely made-up, but I digress.)

Since we're talking about things that happened inside my own head, how can I know whether I actually experienced a certain period of time, or only created a memory of having experienced that time? My own recollection of it may be flawed, so it logically follows that in order to know for sure, I have to find some way to objectively quantify it. I don't know how I'd objectively quantify the number of thoughts I'm having, though, lol.

Re:Messages that can only be understood under the influence ... by swayvil on Tuesday June 06, 2023 @08:48PM (#36221265)
They're skeptical because it stands against convention. The rest is mere justification. Not very serious.

It's funny. You distrust your eyes but trust your thoughts.