The Rust I wanted had no future

Re:The Rust I wanted had no future by FrustratedMonky on Monday June 05, 2023 @08:28AM (#36195290)

I would like to second F#. It seems to have a lot of what people want, so why isn't it more popular?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The Rust I wanted had no future by anonyfox on Monday June 05, 2023 @08:32AM (#36195324)

Can I natively build self-contained binaries? One of Go's biggest advantages is the delivery chain from code to server (build for target arch, copy to target, ./run)?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The Rust I wanted had no future by naraga on Monday June 05, 2023 @08:46AM (#36195444)

I believe you can https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/core/deploying/sing...

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The Rust I wanted had no future by throwaway2037 on Monday June 05, 2023 @11:20AM (#36197489)

I can vouch for it! I returned to C# for a tiny desktop GUI recently. I was blown away by how simple is the tooling to create a single monolithic binary. It's great for enterprise distribution. "No more installer."

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The Rust I wanted had no future by jjtheblunt on Monday June 05, 2023 @09:13AM (#36195711)

Yes

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The Rust I wanted had no future by ontologiae on Monday June 05, 2023 @10:42AM (#36196843)

I had to deal with it, when I hadto parse Transac-SQL code, and it's not handy. Very difficult to have a single executable file containing everything, it needs a whole subtree. OCaml is easier with Opam and ocamlbuild tools.

[ Parent | on HN ]