Re:Calling time on DNSSEC: The costs exceed the benefits
by teddyh on Saturday June 03, 2023 @04:25PM
(#36180219)
> "DNS names aren't supposed to be secret" is not a good faith argument.
Yes it is. Here I am, making it. It’s not even about DNSSEC; it has been the truth ever since the DNS itself was designed. Having secret data in DNS is doomed to fail in any number of ways, since DNS was never designed for it.
And you can’t get away with claiming “Oh, I wasn’t calling you a bad faith gaslighter, only other people. Who are making the same argument as you. And I am saying this in a reply to your comment for no reason in particular.”
Since you are doubling down on calling my argument a bad faith argument, I have no recourse but to leave it at that.
Yes it is. Here I am, making it. It’s not even about DNSSEC; it has been the truth ever since the DNS itself was designed. Having secret data in DNS is doomed to fail in any number of ways, since DNS was never designed for it.
And you can’t get away with claiming “Oh, I wasn’t calling you a bad faith gaslighter, only other people. Who are making the same argument as you. And I am saying this in a reply to your comment for no reason in particular.”
Since you are doubling down on calling my argument a bad faith argument, I have no recourse but to leave it at that.