News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:California Spent $17B on Homelessness. It’s Not Working by crooked-v on Friday June 02, 2023 @04:04AM (#36162435)
On the other hand, $1K a month in SF won't even get you a bed in a shared room. I mean that literally - I just checked apartments.com and there's exactly one listing out of 5,400 right now that's under $1000 and open to non-students.
Re:California Spent $17B on Homelessness. It’s Not Working by atdrummond on Friday June 02, 2023 @04:14AM (#36162520)
They don’t need a bed or a room. You can camp quite comfortably throughout the city all year long thanks to the mild weather.

It’s a very different situation than being homeless in cities with more typical seasonal weather patterns; I nearly lost a number of toes due to frostbite when I was homeless in Saint Louis during a major blizzard. San Francisco’s climate and permissive camping policies help absolve a lot of the housing related issues that are involved with being homeless.

Re:California Spent $17B on Homelessness. It’s Not Working by da39a3ee on Friday June 02, 2023 @07:07PM (#36171978)
> San Francisco’s climate and permissive camping policies help absolve a lot of the housing related issues that are involved with being homeless.

Of course they don't. Living out of a tent on a street makes it extremely hard to get your life onto target for rejoining the economically healthy portion of society. I'm sure you know that. I don't know what you were trying to say.

Re:California Spent $17B on Homelessness. It’s Not Working by fshbbdssbbgdd on Friday June 02, 2023 @04:17AM (#36162555)
Where do you get the idea apartments.com is a source that can inform you about the market price of shared housing?

As a long-time participant in the bay area rental housing market, $1000 is enough to rent a bedroom in many homes, but how would such a listing get onto apartments.com?

If you’re paying more than $1000 to share a bedroom, you’re getting ripped off.

Re:California Spent $17B on Homelessness. It’s Not Working by o1y32 on Friday June 02, 2023 @05:23PM (#36170927)
Your comment does not provide any concrete example. Even if what you say is true, access is a real issue. You think homeless people would know how to find those $1000 options if a random person cannot find them via a simple search?
Re:California Spent $17B on Homelessness. It’s Not Working by fshbbdssbbgdd on Friday June 02, 2023 @07:02PM (#36171943)
Apartments.com seems very corporate, I doubt most people are even aware if they are allowed to post on there.

Check Craigslist, that’s the main place people who are looking for randoms to rent a room will post:

https://sfbay.craigslist.org/search/roo?max_price=1000&min_p...

Of course, most people would prefer to room with family or friends (especially if we’re talking about multiple people in the same room). That’s not an SF issue, it’s human nature. So a lot of roommate groups are going to be formed through word-of-mouth, or smaller community group chats/boards.

Re:California Spent $17B on Homelessness. It’s Not Working by jazzyjackson on Friday June 02, 2023 @02:34PM (#36168992)
You can absolutely find a bedroom for 1000/m, but you're going to have to interact with people.

Check how long those apartments have been listed for, some of them have been listed for a year. If it's an actual competitive price it will get rented immediately.

There are shared housing groups on facebook that will reflect the situation more accurately.

Re:California Spent $17B on Homelessness. It’s Not Working by fragmede on Friday June 02, 2023 @02:39PM (#36169052)
* * *