Which one specific vaccine would that be?
The way things were handled created -many- new vaccine sceptics and that will have a lasting impact for many years to come.
When you tell people their concerns of a specific vaccine are invalid and then claim they are anti-vaccine, you are lying. Why would anyone paying attention then trust you?
Also, some high ranking politicians are on record stating they wouldn't take a vaccine if it was created while Trump was president. Nobody ia dismissing their entire campaign based on these statements.
Thanks for picking one point of my long post and ignoring the other points btw.
Because its not true.
Pretty much everything he’s ever said about any vaccine, but in another branch of this thread I’ve done a short list of some of his more recent lies about COVID-19 vaccines, MMR vaccines, tetanus vaccines, and flu vaccines. (Perhaps the star of that list being the lie about MMR vaccines used to discourage black people from taking COVID-19 vaccines.)
Which all also underlines that the claim that he is against “a specific vaccine” is…not accurate.
He isn't anti-vaccine. He has a problem with a specific vaccine and how it was rolled out (sometimes with limited but relevant force).
I would call that view the only reasonable view. The sheer number of people who will now forever be vaccine sceptics that would never have been before is proof of that. The Pfizer vaccine was presented as being ~95% effective. I am the only person I know personally that has not had COVID. My 100 or so acquaintances are all vaccinated with an extra dose of natural immunity. No wonder people are sceptical, even an idiot can see that it wasn't doing much of anything to stop you from getting covid.
Did it decrease severity? Hard to tell given that almost everyone was vaccinated in my area.
I normally don't comment on vaccines since it is so toxic, hearing the solution from his mouth that made sense however has made it a priority, even as a Canadian.