Capitalism has succeeded then.
Rising inequality is a natural consequence of globalization, AI, robotics, software, and other technologies that tend towards winner-take-all.
That rising inequality is leading to poverty is a failure of government, not corporations or capitalism. Why introduce a layer of indirection by blaming the rich or corporations, when the rules are made by government? Blame the government directly.
This implies that capitalism is not capable of self-regulation and therefore requires government intervention. It follows that this is a joint failure of capitalism and governments to reduce negative externalities that lead to high wealth inequality.
> Let reddit handle the economic ignorance.
Please don't include implicit ad hominem jabs at other posters. You could have omitted your first sentence with no loss to your argument.
Capitalism didn't invent or produce computers or milk. Workers did.
Capitalism is just a wealth distribution mechanism on top of innovation and labor that only concerns itself with how the wealth generated by workers is distributed.
We can choose other mechanisms of wealth distribution.
The gig workers I know do it because they like the money, it's the best money available to them. So I don't know about the "poorly-paid" part, there's so much demand for gig work people complain they can't find enough of it.
Almost as if COVID caused a huge redistribution of money from the poor to the wealthy.
Ferdinand's death didn't cause WW1, it just started it.
Tougher time absolutely, but almost all the visible small businesses in my area survived lockdown.
Spend $800B so the poors can eat? Hand-wringing and pearl clutching up and down the air waves. Just think of the inflation!
Spend $3000B to pump real estate values? Complete silence, relatively speaking.
This experience made it very clear who was in charge and who wasn't. These are US numbers, but I tend to suspect the same story repeated itself all around the world.
I had been waiting to time the market, I ended up only buying 30% down rather than the 50-80% down I was hoping.
What happened in 2020 changed my understanding of markets. Politics>Economics for politicians.
The poor still spent most of their money, the rich did not buy more yachts and expensive meals and attending "charity" galas etc. so what would usually be a circular flow became a direct increase in the wealth of the rich and direct decrease in the wealth of the poor. The inflation we see now is going to remain for a while but in the end prices over the next 3-5 years will nearly double and wages will remain the same.
The rich just increased their wealth and the working person got dramatically poorer. Poor people in the UK can't even afford food and Internet but at least the rich have never had it so good. Tax the rich.
Mind boggling system failure when you can have smartphones for 100bucks but not enough income to pay bills and food regularly.