Re:OpenAI came after our domain because we use GPT in it
by account42 on Wednesday May 17, 2023 @10:16AM
(#35975504)
> A settlement was eventually reached
Or in other words, we didn't get to find out how well it would work.
> Robertson opined that – had legal proceedings ensued – Rowe would have made a strong argument for keeping his domain, as he was using his real name and was not claiming to be affiliated with Microsoft.
Re:OpenAI came after our domain because we use GPT in it
by TuringNYC on Wednesday May 17, 2023 @11:04AM
(#35976302)
>> Or in other words, we didn't get to find out how well it would work.
What small company or individual has the tens of thousands of spare dollars to actually litigate/defend? It doesn't matter if a settlement was reached or whether a strong argument was made --- if you have to spend 10k, or 15k, or 20k to go retain lawyers...it hasn't worked out well!
That didnt work so well in the past:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_v._MikeRoweSoft